Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37713444›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2023

Saturation genome editing of 11 codons and exon 13 of BRCA2 coupled with chemotherapeutic drug response accurately determines pathogenicity of variants.

Sounak Sahu, Teresa L Sullivan, Alexander Y Mitrophanov, Mélissa Galloux, Darryl Nousome, Eileen Southon, Dylan Caylor, Arun Prakash Mishra, Christine N Evans, Michelle E Clapp and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Reclassification ofCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Saturation Genome Editing TargetingCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. MaveMD: A functional data resource for genomic medicine.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sounak SahuMouse Cancer Genetics Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7290-6651
Teresa L SullivanMouse Cancer Genetics Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Alexander Y MitrophanovStatistical Consulting and Scientific Programming, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9019-4034
Mélissa GallouxIndependent bioinformatician, Marseille, France.ORCID 0009-0009-4424-6815
Darryl NousomeCCR Bioinformatics Resource, Leidos Biomedical Sciences, Inc. Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Eileen SouthonMouse Cancer Genetics Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Dylan CaylorMouse Cancer Genetics Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Arun Prakash MishraMouse Cancer Genetics Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6558-1166
Christine N EvansGenome Modification Core, Laboratory Animal Sciences Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Michelle E ClappGenome Modification Core, Laboratory Animal Sciences Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Sandra BurkettMouse Cancer Genetics Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5476-4028
Tyler MalysStatistical Consulting and Scientific Programming, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Raj ChariGenome Modification Core, Laboratory Animal Sciences Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Kajal BiswasMouse Cancer Genetics Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Shyam K SharanMouse Cancer Genetics Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9333-870X
National Cancer Institute · USFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · USNational Institutes of Health · USLeidos (United States) · US

Funding

NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201500003CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201500003I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The unknown pathogenicity of a significant number of variants found in cancer-related genes is attributed to limited epidemiological data, resulting in their classification as variant of uncertain significance (VUS). To date, Breast Cancer gene-2 (BRCA2) has the highest number of VUSs, which has necessitated the development of several robust functional assays to determine their functional significance. Here we report the use of a humanized-mouse embryonic stem cell (mESC) line expressing a single copy of the human BRCA2 for a CRISPR-Cas9-based high-throughput functional assay. As a proof-of-principle, we have saturated 11 codons encoded by BRCA2 exons 3, 18, 19 and all possible single-nucleotide variants in exon 13 and multiplexed these variants for their functional categorization. Specifically, we used a pool of 180-mer single-stranded donor DNA to generate all possible combination of variants. Using a high throughput sequencing-based approach, we show a significant drop in the frequency of non-functional variants, whereas functional variants are enriched in the pool of the cells. We further demonstrate the response of these variants to the DNA-damaging agents, cisplatin and olaparib, allowing us to use cellular survival and drug response as parameters for variant classification. Using this approach, we have categorized 599 BRCA2 variants including 93-single nucleotide variants (SNVs) across the 11 codons, of which 28 are reported in ClinVar. We also functionally categorized 252 SNVs from exon 13 into 188 functional and 60 non-functional variants, demonstrating that saturation genome editing (SGE) coupled with drug sensitivity assays can enhance functional annotation of BRCA2 VUS.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsGene EditingAnimalsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinCodonExonsFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMiceNucleotidesVirulenceBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanCodonNucleotides

Identifiers

PMID37713444
PMCPMC10529611
OpenAlexW4386766974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.