ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2023
Retraction Statement: Novel NAD-independent Avibacterium paragallinarum: Isolation, characterization and molecular identification in Iran.
Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction of
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Beiranvand, S., Piri-Gharaghie, T., Dehganzad, B., Khedmati, F., Jalali, F., AsadAlizadeh, M., & Momtaz, H. (2022). Novel NAD-independent Avibacterium paragallinarum: Isolation, characterization and molecular identification in Iran. Veterinary Medicine and Science, 8, 1157- 1165. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.754. The above article, published online on 19 February 2022 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the journal's Editor-in-Chief, Dr Gayle Hallowell, and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The retraction has been agreed following concerns raised that a number of figures within the results section were not original and had been used without permission from the copyright holder. The authors were asked to provide their original data for review by the editorial team to corroborate their results. The editorial team were unable to verify the data provided and, as a result, have concerns about the conclusions of the article. The journal is therefore issuing this retraction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.