ArticlePloS one2023
Ion exchange chromatography as a simple and scalable method to isolate biologically active small extracellular vesicles from conditioned media.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extracellular Vesicles as a Potential Tool in Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Bioprocess Design and Optimization of Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Mesenchymal Stromal Cells.ACS nano · 2026Article
- Application of extracellular vesicles in the CRISPR-based diagnosis and treatment: possibilities and challenges.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- Review
- Emerging Biomimetic Drug Delivery Nanoparticles Inspired by Extracellular Vesicles.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the last few years, extracellular vesicles (EVs) have become of great interest due to their potential as biomarkers, drug delivery systems, and, in particular, therapeutic agents. However, there is no consensus on which is the best way to isolate these EVs. The choice of the isolation method depends on the starting material (i.e., conditioned culture media, urine, serum, etc.) and their downstream applications. Even though there are numerous methods to isolate EVs, few are compatible with clinical applications as they are not scalable. In the present work, we set up a protocol to isolate EVs from conditioned media by ion exchange chromatography, a simple, fast, and scalable method, suitable for clinical production. We performed the isolation using an anion exchange resin (Q sepharose) and eluted the EVs using 500 mM NaCl. We characterized the elution profile by measuring protein and lipid concentration, and CD63 by ELISA. Moreover, we immunophenotyped all the eluted fractions, assessed the presence of TSG101, calnexin, and cytochrome C by western blot, analyzed nanoparticle size and distribution by tRPS, and morphology by TEM. Finally, we evaluated the immunomodulatory activity in vitro. We found that most EVs are eluted and concentrated in a single peak fraction, with a mean particle size of <150nm and expression of CD9, CD63, CD81, and TSG101 markers. Moreover, sEVs in fraction 4 exerted an anti-inflammatory activity on LPS-stimulated macrophages. In summary, we set up a chromatographic, scalable, and clinically compatible method to isolate and concentrate small EVs from conditioned media, which preserves the EVs biological activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.