Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37713385›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2023

The potential of digital behavioural tests as a diagnostic aid for psychosis.

Piotr Słowiński, Alexander White, Sian Lison, Sarah Sullivan, Tobit Emmens, Philip Self, Jane Wileman, Anke Karl, Krasimira Tsaneva-Atanasova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Piotr SłowińskiTranslational Research Exchange @ Exeter, Living Systems Institute, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Environment, Science and Economy, University of Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6612-9902
Alexander WhiteDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8582-9963
Sian LisonResearch & Development Department, Devon Partnership NHS Trust, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Sarah SullivanFaculty of Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
Tobit EmmensResearch & Development Department, Devon Partnership NHS Trust, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Philip SelfResearch & Development Department, Devon Partnership NHS Trust, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Jane WilemanSpecialist Team for Early Psychosis, Devon Partnership NHS Trust, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Anke KarlDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, United Kingdom.
Krasimira Tsaneva-AtanasovaTranslational Research Exchange @ Exeter, Living Systems Institute, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Environment, Science and Economy, University of Exeter, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Timely interventions have a proven benefit for people experiencing psychotic illness. One bottleneck to accessing timely interventions is the referral process to the specialist team for early psychosis (STEP). Many general practitioners lack awareness or confidence in recognising psychotic symptoms or state. Additionally, referrals for people without apparent psychotic symptoms, although beneficial at a population level, lead to excessive workload for STEPs. There is a clear unmet need for accurate stratification of STEPs users and healthy cohorts. Here we propose a new approach to addressing this need via the application of digital behavioural tests. To demonstrate that digital behavioural tests can be used to discriminate between the STEPs users (SU; n = 32) and controls (n = 32, age and sex matched), we compared performance of five different classifiers applied to objective, quantitative and interpretable features derived from the 'mirror game' (MG) and trail making task (TMT). The MG is a movement coordination task shown to be a potential socio-motor biomarker of schizophrenia, while TMT is a neuropsychiatric test of cognitive function. All classifiers had AUC in the range of 0.84-0.92. The best of the five classifiers (linear discriminant classifier) achieved an outstanding performance, AUC = 0.92 (95%CI 0.75-1), Sensitivity = 0.75 (95%CI 0.5-1), Specificity = 1 (95%CI 0.75-1), evaluated on 25% hold-out and 1000 folds. Performance of all analysed classifiers is underpinned by the large effect sizes of the differences between the cohorts in terms of the features used for classification what ensures generalisability of the results. We also found that MG and TMT are unsuitable in isolation to successfully differentiate between SU with and without at-risk-mental-state or first episode psychosis with sufficient level of performance. Our findings show that standardised batteries of digital behavioural tests could benefit both clinical and research practice. Including digital behavioural tests into healthcare practice could allow precise phenotyping and stratification of the highly heterogenous population of people referred to STEPs resulting in quicker and more personalised diagnosis. Moreover, the high specificity of digital behavioural tests could facilitate the identification of more homogeneous clinical high-risk populations, benefiting research on prognostic instruments for psychosis. In summary, our study demonstrates that cheap off-the-shelf equipment (laptop computer and a leap motion sensor) can be used to record clinically relevant behavioural data that could be utilised in digital mental health applications.

Identifiers

PMID37713385
PMCPMC10503702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.