Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37713195›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Bipolar At-Risk Criteria and Risk of Bipolar Disorder Over 10 or More Years.

Aswin Ratheesh, Dylan Hammond, Michael Watson, Jennifer Betts, Emma Siegel, Patrick McGorry, Michael Berk, Susan Cotton, Andrew Chanen, Barnaby Nelson and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Risk Factors Associated with Longitudinal Trajectories of Mania Symptoms in Youth.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Aswin RatheeshOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Dylan HammondOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Michael WatsonOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Jennifer BettsOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Emma SiegelOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Patrick McGorryOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Michael BerkInstitute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Deakin University School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Susan CottonOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Andrew ChanenOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Barnaby NelsonOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Andreas BechdolfDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Vivantes Klinikum am Urban und Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany.
The University of Melbourne · AUOrygen · AUBarwon Health · AUKlinikum im Friedrichshain · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Predicting the onset of bipolar disorder (BD) could facilitate preventive treatments. Among risk measures, bipolar at-risk (BAR) criteria have shown promise in predicting onset of bipolar disorder in the first year in clinical cohorts; however, it is not known whether BAR criteria are associated with the onset of BD in the longer term. Objective: To assess the association of BAR criteria with onset of BD over 10 to 13 years follow-up. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study, completed between May 1, 2020, and November 7, 2022, included consenting people seeking help for nonpsychotic major mental health difficulties, including mood, personality, and substance use disorders, who were originally recruited at ages 15 to 25 years from a tertiary youth mental health setting in metropolitan Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, from May 1, 2008, to September 30, 2010. Exposure: Meeting BAR criteria at baseline. Criteria included subthreshold mania, cyclothymic features, subthreshold depression, and family history of BD. A matched clinical comparison group was recruited from the same help-seeking population. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was expert consensus diagnosis of BD I or II based on the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, self-reported information collected through online assessments, and linked data on mental health service utilization in Victoria over 10 to 13 years of follow-up. Results: Among 69 eligible participants, follow-up data were available for 60 (88.2%). The mean (SD) age at the end of follow-up was 32.9 (2.8) years, and 49 (81.7%) were women. A total of 28 participants met BAR criteria, and 32 were in the comparison group. In the BAR group, 8 patients (28.6%) developed BD over a mean (SD) of 11.1 (0.7) years of follow-up, and no patients in the comparison group developed BD. The risk of developing BD was higher in the BAR group than in the non-BAR group (χ21 = 70.0; P < .001). The proportions of transitions to BD were equal in the first and second halves of the follow-up period. Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of participants seeking care for mental health difficulties, patients meeting the BAR criteria were significantly more likely to transition to BD over a decade after ascertainment compared with patients not meeting the BAR criteria. The findings suggest that those meeting BAR criteria may benefit from longer-term monitoring and support. Evaluation of predictive properties in longer-term studies using a risk measure will help with implementation of BAR criteria in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderAdolescentCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleManiaProspective StudiesVictoria

Identifiers

PMID37713195
PMCPMC10504610
OpenAlexW4386757002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.