Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37713007›Full record

ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2024

Comparison of convolutional-neural-networks-based method and LCModel on the quantification of in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Yu-Long Huang, Yi-Ru Lin, Shang-Yueh Tsai

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yu-Long HuangDepartment of Electronic and Computer Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yi-Ru LinDepartment of Electronic and Computer Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shang-Yueh TsaiGraduate Institute of Applied Physics, National Chengchi University, No.64, Sec.2, ZhiNan Rd., Wenshan District, Taipei, 11605, Taiwan. sytsai@nccu.edu.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6310-4750

Funding

National Science and Technology Council 107-2221-E-011-053National Science and Technology Council 108-2314-B-004 -001National Science and Technology Council 111-2314-B-004 -001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuantification of metabolites concentrations in institutional unit (IU) is important for inter-subject and long-term comparisons in the applications of magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). Recently, deep learning (DL) algorithms have found a variety of applications on the process of MRS data. A quantification strategy compatible to DL base MRS spectral processing method is, therefore, useful. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study aims to investigate whether metabolite concentrations quantified using a convolutional neural network (CNN) based method, coupled with a scaling procedure that normalizes spectral signals for CNN input and linear regression, can effectively reflect variations in metabolite concentrations in IU across different brain regions with varying signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) and linewidths (LW). An error index based on standard error (SE) is proposed to indicate the confidence levels associated with metabolite predictions. In vivo MRS spectra were acquired from three brain regions of 43 subjects using a 3T system.

resultsThe metabolite concentrations in IU of five major metabolites, quantified using CNN and LCModel, exhibit similar ranges with Pearson's correlation coefficients ranging from 0.24 to 0.78. The SE of the metabolites shows a positive correlation with Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB) (r=0.46) and  absolute CRLB (r=0.81), calculated by multiplying CRLBs with the quantified metabolite content.

conclusionIn conclusion, the CNN based method with the proposed scaling procedures can be employed to quantify in vivo MRS spectra and derive metabolites concentrations in IU. The SE can be used as error index, indicating predicted uncertainties for metabolites and sharing information similar to the absolute CRLB.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBrainDeep LearningMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyNeural Networks, ComputerSignal-To-Noise RatioAdultAspartic AcidFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleYoung AdultAspartic AcidN-acetylaspartateConvolutional neural networkMagnetic resonance spectroscopyMetabolite concentrations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.