ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2024
Comparison of convolutional-neural-networks-based method and LCModel on the quantification of in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundQuantification of metabolites concentrations in institutional unit (IU) is important for inter-subject and long-term comparisons in the applications of magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). Recently, deep learning (DL) algorithms have found a variety of applications on the process of MRS data. A quantification strategy compatible to DL base MRS spectral processing method is, therefore, useful. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study aims to investigate whether metabolite concentrations quantified using a convolutional neural network (CNN) based method, coupled with a scaling procedure that normalizes spectral signals for CNN input and linear regression, can effectively reflect variations in metabolite concentrations in IU across different brain regions with varying signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) and linewidths (LW). An error index based on standard error (SE) is proposed to indicate the confidence levels associated with metabolite predictions. In vivo MRS spectra were acquired from three brain regions of 43 subjects using a 3T system.
resultsThe metabolite concentrations in IU of five major metabolites, quantified using CNN and LCModel, exhibit similar ranges with Pearson's correlation coefficients ranging from 0.24 to 0.78. The SE of the metabolites shows a positive correlation with Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB) (r=0.46) and absolute CRLB (r=0.81), calculated by multiplying CRLBs with the quantified metabolite content.
conclusionIn conclusion, the CNN based method with the proposed scaling procedures can be employed to quantify in vivo MRS spectra and derive metabolites concentrations in IU. The SE can be used as error index, indicating predicted uncertainties for metabolites and sharing information similar to the absolute CRLB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37713007What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.