Novel and portable test strip platform for rapid and sensitive on-site detection of procymidone pesticide.

Di Xu, Lili Zhang, Guangying Zhang, Wenyue Liu, Ying Lu

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Mikrochimica acta, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Di XuCollege of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, 201306, China.

Lili ZhangCollege of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, 201306, China.

Guangying ZhangCollege of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, 201306, China.

Wenyue LiuCollege of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, 201306, China.

Ying LuCollege of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, 201306, China. y-lu@shou.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6600-7817

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32172324State Key Laboratory of Soil Plant Machinery System Technology SKLPBS2252

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A novel and portable detection platform for procymidone (PRM) was developed by combining simple sample pretreatment, lateral flow test strips based on multi-branched gold nanoparticle (LFTS-MBGNP), and a smartphone. Based on the large surface area of MBGNPs, rapid detection of PRM was realized by simple naked eye observation. By utilizing a smartphone as a portable signal analyzer, ultrasensitive quantitative detection of PRM in red wine was realized with the limits of detection (LOD) of 1.60 ng/mL, which was 3000 times lower than the US limit (5 ppm). Moreover, rapid detection of four kinds of fruits and vegetables was achieved within 10 min, with LODs of 4.34 ng/g, 6.93 ng/g, 8.99 ng/g, and 5.03 ng/g, respectively, which could meet the PRM limit of the European Union (10 ng/g). Integrating the optimized QuEChERS pretreatment method, the developed platform realized a simple and sensitive on-site detection of PRM pesticide in foods and red wine within 45 min. This platform provides a useful tool and new idea for rapid screening and detection of pesticide residues in food.

Indexed as

Metal NanoparticlesPesticide ResiduesPesticidesBridged Bicyclo CompoundsGoldBridged Bicyclo CompoundsGoldPesticide ResiduesPesticidesprocymidoneColorimetryMulti-branched gold nanoparticlesPesticide residuesProcymidoneQuEChERSSmartphone-based quantitative detectionTest strip

Identifiers

PMID37713003

DOI10.1007/s00604-023-05960-3

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.