Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37712726›Full record

ArticleCritical care science2023

Factors associated with mortality in mechanically ventilated patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome due to COVID-19 evolution.

João Paulo Arruda de Oliveira, Andreia Cristina Travassos Costa, Agnaldo José Lopes, Arthur de Sá Ferreira, Luis Felipe da Fonseca Reis

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Joint statement on evidence-based practices in mechanical ventilation: suggestions from two Brazilian medical societies.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

João Paulo Arruda de OliveiraPostgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Centro Universitário Augusto Motta - Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4034-3588
Andreia Cristina Travassos CostaIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Oswaldo Cruz - Tocantins (TO), Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4067-4184
Agnaldo José LopesPostgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Centro Universitário Augusto Motta - Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8598-4878
Arthur de Sá FerreiraPostgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Centro Universitário Augusto Motta - Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7014-2002
Luis Felipe da Fonseca ReisPostgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Centro Universitário Augusto Motta - Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6812-6553

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the factors associated with mortality in mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19.

methodsThis was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study that included 425 mechanically ventilated adult patients with COVID-19 admitted to 4 intensive care units. Clinical data comprising the SOFA score, laboratory data and mechanical characteristics of the respiratory system were collected in a standardized way immediately after the start of invasive mechanical ventilation. The risk factors for death were analyzed using Cox regression to estimate the risk ratios and their respective 95%CIs.

resultsBody mass index (RR 1.17; 95%CI 1.11 - 1.20; p < 0.001), SOFA score (RR 1.39; 95%CI 1.31 - 1.49; p < 0.001) and driving pressure (RR 1.24; 95%CI 1.21 - 1.29; p < 0.001) were considered independent factors associated with mortality in mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19. Respiratory system compliance (RR 0.92; 95%CI 0.90 - 0.93; p < 0.001) was associated with lower mortality. The comparative analysis of the survival curves indicated that patients with respiratory system compliance (< 30mL/cmH2O), a higher SOFA score (> 5 points) and higher driving pressure (> 14cmH2O) were more significantly associated with the outcome of death at 28 days and 60 days.

conclusionPatients with a body mass index > 32kg/m2, respiratory system compliance < 30mL/cmH2O, driving pressure > 14cmH2O and SOFA score > 5.8 immediately after the initiation of invasive ventilatory support had worse outcomes, and independent risk factors were associated with higher mortality in this population.

Indexed as

COVID-19Respiratory Distress SyndromeAdultCohort StudiesHumansRespiration, ArtificialRetrospective StudiesartificialCoronavirus infectionsCOVID-19MortalityRespirationRespiratory distress syndromeRespiratory mechanicsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID37712726
PMCPMC10275312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.