ArticleTobacco induced diseases2023
Association of dual use of cigarettes with obstructive sleep apnea assessed by the STOP-Bang score.
Article in Tobacco induced diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparison of e-Cigarette and Cigarette Use and Dual Use Associations With Disease: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)Pooled it
- Association Between Electronic Cigarette Use and Risk of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Among Korean Adults: A Cross-Sectional Nationwide Population-Based Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Sleep disturbances among young adult dual users of cigarettes and e-cigarettes: Analysis of the 2020 National Health Interview Survey.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAlthough previous studies have addressed the association between smoking and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), there are few studies on the association between electronic cigarette use and OSA. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the association between the dual use of electronic and conventional cigarettes and OSA.
methodsData from 7350 participants of the 2019-2021 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were analyzed in this population-based study. The STOP-Bang score was calculated using eight items: snoring, tiredness, observed apnea, high blood pressure, body mass index, age, neck circumference, and sex. The main independent variable was smoking behavior. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed. Subgroup analysis was conducted to analyze the association between smoking behavior in detail and OSA, and stratified analyses were additionally performed.
resultsOf the 7350 participants, 417 (5.7%) had a high risk of OSA, according to the STOP-Bang score. Compared to the non-smoker group, the dual user group had a 2.46-fold increase in the odds of OSA (adjusted odds ratio, AOR = 2.45; 95% CI: 1.04-5.79). Current non-smokers who were dual users in the past had increased odds of having OSA (AOR=3.61; 95% CI: 1.32-9.92). In the stratified analyses, dual cigarette use was significantly associated with OSA in females and those with a low physical activity level.
conclusionsDual users and cigarette-only users had an increased probability of developing OSA. Even if they are not currently smoking or vaping, individuals who were dual users in the past were associated with a higher risk of OSA. The association between dual cigarette use and OSA was more pronounced in females and those with a low physical activity level. While intervening for obstructive sleep apnea or investigating risk factors, new smoking methods such as vaping and dual use should be considered along with conventional smoking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.