ReviewCureus2023
Analysis of Gender-Based Inequality in Cardiovascular Health: An Umbrella Review.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular disease prevention by personalized health promotion considering educational attainment.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Role of a Heart Center for Women in the Prevention and Diagnosis of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Women.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Review
- Sex-specific relation of replacing sedentary time with physical activity on stage 2 hypertension incidence in middle-aged adults.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- Nurse-Led Secondary Prevention After Acute Coronary Syndrome: Bridging the Gender Gap in Cardiovascular Outcomes-A Sub-Analysis of the BEAT-HF Study.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Sex differences in guideline adherence for coronary angiography in patients with suspected chronic coronary syndrome in Germany: insights from the ENLIGHT-KHK trial.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025Article
- Trends and Disparities in Dementia Among Older Adults With Coronary Artery Disease, 1999-2023: Insights From the CDC WONDER Database.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Beyond BMI: Metabolic Signatures of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in a Sudanese Cohort.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Sex Differences in Anxiety and Depression Among Coronary Heart Disease Patients During Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Quasi-Experimental Study.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Life's Essential 8 cardiovascular health status of 18-69-year-old individuals in France.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025Article
- Review
- Observational
- A new metric to understand the association between heart rate variability and menstrual regularity.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Sex-based disparities with cost-related medication adherence issues in patients with hypertension, ischemic heart disease, and heart failure.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- The Sociodemographic Biases in Machine Learning Algorithms: A Biomedical Informatics Perspective.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Disparities and Outcomes in the First and Second Year of the Pandemic on Events of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Sex Differences in the Impact of BMI on Length of Hospital Stay in Hypertensive Patients Admitted to a Cardiology Department: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Vascular health and risk management · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This umbrella review aims to investigate possible gender-based inequality in cardiovascular health and improve understanding surrounding differing presentations seen in women. Searches of current literature were conducted using Medline; Cochrane; Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL Plus); and PubMed databases. Focusing on systematic reviews and meta-analyses from the last decade, searches were expanded to the publication year of 2000 onwards, to enable a broader review of current practices. Current clinical guidelines were also reviewed. 17 articles were deemed to satisfy the desired criteria and were therefore carried forward to be critically appraised. The articles reviewed were multifactorial; however, they can be grouped into four categories of common focus: risk factors, presentation, treatment, and current research. On critical analysis, 13 reoccurring themes were noted throughout the reviewed articles with each discussed in detail within this review. There is a need to prioritize women in cardiovascular health, through raising awareness, improving prevention (both primary and secondary), reducing delays in presentation, and increasing understanding and recognition of sex differences in symptom presentation, to enable improved diagnosis and treatment along with the standardization of gender-specific clinical guidance. The results are unanimous regarding an undeniable gender-based inequality in cardiovascular health to the detriment of women. With such damning evidence that women are under-represented and indeed undertreated, the time has come now to question whether women should be considered as their own specialty within cardiology and to ultimately raise awareness and ensure women are given the same consideration regarding cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment and treatment, in order to finally remove gender inequality in cardiovascular (CV) health. In order to reverse this disparity, it is clear from the included studies that further research is required to understand the sex differences seen in both the presentation and symptoms of CVD as well as to enable improved treatment of women and the development of sex-specific strategies and clinical guidance to empower clinicians moving forward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.