Progestin-only contraception is first line for sickle cell disease: a comment on "Hormonal therapies in females with blood disorders: thrombophilia, thrombosis, hemoglobinopathies, and anemias."

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Estrogen, progestin, and beyond: thrombotic risk and contraceptive choices.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2024
   Review
2. Sickle cell disease and infertility risks: implications for counseling and care of affected girls and women.Expert review of hematology · 2024
   Review
3. Disease severity drives risk of venous thrombotic events in women with sickle cell disease in a single-center retrospective study.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024
   Article
4. Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.