ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Non-annotated renal histopathological image analysis with deep ensemble learning.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in small tissue biopsies: diagnostic applications, histochemical integration, and methodological challenges in surgical pathology.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-driven digital pathology in urological cancers: current trends and future directions.Prostate international · 2025Review
- Exploiting deep transfer learning based precise classification and grading of renal cell carcinoma using histopathological images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advanced deep learning for multi-class colorectal cancer histopathology: integrating transfer learning and ensemble methods.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Application of Machine Learning and Deep EfficientNets in Distinguishing Neonatal Adrenal Hematomas From Neuroblastoma in Enhanced Computed Tomography Images.World journal of oncology · 2024Article
- Evaluating the effectiveness of stain normalization techniques in automated grading of invasive ductal carcinoma histopathological images.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Histopathological Gastric Cancer Detection on GasHisSDB Dataset Using Deep Ensemble Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Renal cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and early detection of renal cancer can significantly improve the patients' survival rate. However, the manual analysis of renal tissue in the current clinical practices is labor-intensive, prone to inter-pathologist variations and easy to miss the important cancer markers, especially in the early stage. Methods: In this work, we developed deep convolutional neural network (CNN) based heterogeneous ensemble models for automated analysis of renal histopathological images without detailed annotations. The proposed method would first segment the histopathological tissue into patches with different magnification factors, then classify the generated patches into normal and tumor tissues using the pre-trained CNNs and lastly perform the deep ensemble learning to determine the final classification. The heterogeneous ensemble models consisted of CNN models from five deep learning architectures, namely VGG, ResNet, DenseNet, MobileNet, and EfficientNet. These CNN models were fine-tuned and used as base learners, they exhibited different performances and had great diversity in histopathological image analysis. The CNN models with superior classification accuracy (Acc) were then selected to undergo ensemble learning for the final classification. The performance of the investigated ensemble approaches was evaluated against the state-of-the-art literature. Results: The performance evaluation demonstrated the superiority of the proposed best performing ensembled model: five-CNN based weighted averaging model, with an Acc (99%), specificity (Sp) (98%), F1-score (F1) (99%) and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (98%) but slightly inferior recall (Re) (99%) compared to the literature. Conclusions: The outstanding robustness of the developed ensemble model with a superiorly high-performance scores in the evaluated metrics suggested its reliability as a diagnosis system for assisting the pathologists in analyzing the renal histopathological tissues. It is expected that the proposed ensemble deep CNN models can greatly improve the early detection of renal cancer by making the diagnosis process more efficient, and less misdetection and misdiagnosis; subsequently, leading to higher patients' survival rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.