Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37711807›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023

Optimization and validation of voxel size-related radiomics variability by combatting batch effect harmonization in pulmonary nodules: a phantom and clinical study.

Yaoyao Zhuo, Jie Shen, Yi Zhan, Ye Tian, Mingfeng Yu, Shuyi Yang, Peiyan Ye, Li Fan, Zhiyong Zhang, Fei Shan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Role of Harmonization: A Systematic Analysis of Various Task-based Scenarios.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yaoyao Zhuo *Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jie Shen *Department of Radiology, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yi ZhanDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ye TianDepartment of Radiology, Beilun Second People's Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Mingfeng YuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Beilun Second People's Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Shuyi YangDepartment of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Peiyan YeDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Li FanDepartment of Radiology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Zhiyong Zhang *Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Fei Shan *Department of Radiology, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Broad generalization of radiomics-assisted models may be impeded by concerns about variability. This study aimed to evaluate the merit of combatting batch effect (ComBat) harmonization in reducing the variability of voxel size-related radiomics in both phantom and clinical study in comparison with image resampling correction method. Methods: A pulmonary phantom with 22 different types of nodules was scanned by computed tomography (CT) with different voxel sizes. The variability of voxel size-related radiomics features was evaluated using concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), dynamic range (DR), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). ComBat and image resampling compensation methods were used to reduce variability of voxel size-related radiomics. The percentage of robust radiomics features was compared before and after optimization. Pathologically differential diagnosis of invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) from adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) (AIS-MIA group) was used for clinical validation in 134 patients. Results: Before optimization, the number of excellent features in the phantom and clinical data was 26.12% and 32.31%, respectively. The excellent features were increased after image resampling and ComBat correction. For clinical optimization, the effect of the ComBat compensation method was significantly better than that of image resampling, with excellent features reaching 90.96% and poor features only amounting to 4.96%. In addition, the hierarchical clustering analysis showed that the first-order and shape features had better robustness than did texture features. In clinical validation, the area under the curve (AUC) of the testing set was 0.865 after ComBat correction. Conclusions: The ComBat harmonization can optimize voxel size-related CT radiomics variability in pulmonary nodules more efficiently than image resampling harmonization.

Indexed as

Combatting batch effect (ComBat)computed tomography radiomics (CT radiomics)image resamplingpulmonary noduleradiomics variability

Identifiers

PMID37711807
PMCPMC10498235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.