ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Percutaneous microwave ablation for lung tumors: a retrospective case-control study of conventional CT and C-arm CT guidance.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microwave technologies for biomedical diagnosis and therapy: advances, challenges, and perspectives.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Review
- Single-center experience in combined video-assisted thoracic surgery with transbronchial microwave ablation-a novel approach to multifocal lung nodules.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Rapid Path Planning Algorithm for Percutaneous Rigid Needle Biopsy Based on Optical Illumination Principles.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Analysis of tumor treatment under interventional ultrasound through structural and temporal dynamics: a bibliometric visualization.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Image fusion for intraoperative evaluation of microwave ablation in non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Retrospective cohort study on the correlation analysis among peri-procedural factors, complications, and local tumor progression of lung tumors treated with CT-guided microwave ablation.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although conventional computed tomography (cCT) is the mainstream guidance equipment for lung microwave ablation (MWA), C-arm CT can provide 3-dimensional (3D) CT-like images reconstructed from 2-dimensional (2D) digital subtraction angiography (DSA) information within 8 seconds, highlighting its utility as a new guidance tool. This retrospective case-control study was performed to evaluate the clinical performance of percutaneous MWA for lung tumors using cCT and C-arm CT guidance. Methods: From April 2015 to April 2020, 101 consecutive patients with solitary lung tumors who underwent percutaneous MWA at our single center (Zhengzhou, China) were divided into 2 groups: the cCT group (n=56), with unarmed puncture, and the C-arm CT group (n=45), with iGuide navigation-assisted puncture. The primary endpoints were technical success, technical efficacy, puncture scoring (PS), and complete ablation (CA) rate. The secondary endpoints were complications, median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS). Results: The technical success rates were 100% in both the C-arm CT group and cCT group. The technical efficacies were 93.3% and 91.1% in the C-arm CT group and cCT group, respectively, with no statistical difference (P=0.67). The PS (2.9 Conclusions: C-arm CT guidance is as feasible and effective as cCT for lung tumor MWA, which can increase PS and decrease TPT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.