ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Imaging features of cardioembolic stroke on 4-dimensional computed tomography angiography.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical application of third-generation dual-source CT-based dynamic imaging reconstruction for pulmonary embolism imaging.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Trial
- Downstream Occlusion During Mechanical Thrombectomy: Clinical Implications and Endovascular Trajectory.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Improving the Feasibility of Mitigating Phase Errors in 4DCT caused by a Random Reference Breathing Pattern in the Quasar Phantom and the Role of Slice Thickness.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Identifying cardioembolic stroke is important for the decision-making of endovascular treatment and anticoagulation therapy. We aimed to explore the features of cardioembolic stroke on 4-dimensional (4D) computed tomography angiography (4D-CTA) and assess whether these features can assist in classifying stroke etiology. Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed the images of 294 patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) from July 2020 to February 2022 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, which had been consecutively collected. The data of 110 patients with occlusion of the M1/M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) with/without intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion were analyzed to calculate the clot burden score (CBS) and collateral score (CS), and the data of 88 patients with a clear origin and distal part were analyzed to measure clot length. Maximum intensity projection (MIP) and time MIP (tMIP) post-processing were used to assess the clot features. The Mann-Whitney Results: Age, high-risk factors for cerebrovascular disease, high/medium-risk sources of cardioembolic stroke, clot length, CBS, and CS were significantly different between the cardioembolic stroke group and non-cardioembolic stroke group (P<0.05). In the cardioembolic stroke group, the median MIP and tMIP clot length was 12 mm [interquartile range (IQR), 8.3-17.4 mm] and 9.3 mm (IQR, 6.8-14.3 mm), respectively. In the non-cardioembolic stroke group, the median MIP and tMIP clot length was 6.5 mm (IQR, 4.7-11.5 mm) and 5.8 mm (IQR, 3.9-10.6 mm), respectively. Binary logistic regression showed that cardioembolic stroke was significantly associated with MIP-clot length [odds ratio (OR), 1.15; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-1.29; P<0.05], tMIP-clot length (OR, 1.18; 95% CI: 1.02-1.36; P<0.05), and tMIP-CBS (OR, 3.96; 95% CI: 1.08-14.58; P<0.05). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) values of MIP clot length for identifying cardioembolic stroke were 0.75 (95% CI: 0.65-0.84, P<0.05), with a cut-off value of >7.4 mm [sensitivity: 84.62% (95% CI: 69.50-94.10%); specificity: 59.18% (95% CI: 44.20-73.00%)]. The AUC value of tMIP clot length was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.61-0.81, P<0.05), with a cut-off value of >5.4 mm [sensitivity: 92.31% (95% CI: 79.10-98.40%); specificity: 48.98% (95% CI: 34.40-63.70%)]. Conclusions: Clot length and CBS were overestimated on MIP images. Among the clot characteristics, clot length could identify cardioembolic stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.