ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2023
Synchronous Melanoma: Definition, Prognosis, and Implications. A Comprehensive Review of Literature.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multiple synchronous primary melanomas; A case report.JPRAS open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although multiple primary melanomas (MPMs) have been reported in the literature, the subgroup of synchronous melanomas (SMs) remains understudied. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive systematic review of the English literature from 1972 to 2023 to characterize SM. Our objective was to clarify the definition, determine incidence and prognosis, and present recommendations. Results: We found 18 case series articles and six case reports that met our criteria. Twelve of eighteen studies defined SM as a second primary melanoma identified within 1 month. The total number of SM patients reported was 1083. The cumulative percentage of MPM in total melanoma patients was 2.9 %, and the cumulative percentage of SM patients in MPM patients was 31.3%. SM patients trended toward higher body anatomical concordance, older age, and male sex. Despite limited data, SMs do not show a worse prognosis for patients compared with single melanomas. Conclusions: Despite a lack of consensus in the past, we recommend that SM be defined as a second primary melanoma detected within 1 month of the initial diagnosis. SMs comprise almost one-third of MPM cases and do not seem to carry any worse prognosis than the patients presenting with single melanoma. We believe older age and male sex may be more prone to SM. We recommend patient education, self-skin evaluations and TSE at initial and follow-up visits. Neither randomized controlled trials nor meta-analyses on SM exist. Ideally, further studies with a large cohort of patients are needed to accurately define SM.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.