ArticleResuscitation plus2023
Basic life support training for people with disabilities. A scoping review.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Layperson basic life support education in Austria: An overview].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2024Review
- Mirror, mirror, on the wall, who's the fairest of them all?Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- Article
- Tailored Basic Life Support Training for Specific Layperson Populations-A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Periodontal Health among Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities Living in a Saudi Institutional Rehabilitation Centre.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The integration of populations with various types of disabilities into basic life support (BLS) training programs could contribute to a potential increase in trained laypersons with BLS knowledge and, consequently, in survival rates. The objective of this study was to analyze the distinct educational methods which exist today on BLS for people with some type of specific disability, and to evaluate their impact on the quality of BLS maneuvers. Methods: A scoping review in which the different training strategies in BLS for people with distinctive disabilities were analyzed was carried out. Previous studies were sought and researched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from the beginning up to 4 August 2023. Results: A total of 14 studies were thoroughly analyzed. The BLS training strategies for people with disabilities were classified according to the following criteria: objective (training, content validation or analysis of learning barriers), target population (visual, hearing, physical disabilities or Down syndrome), training resources (training with/without adaptation), contents (BLS and use of the automated external defibrillator) and evaluation instrument (i.e., the simulation test and knowledge questionnaire). The variety of BLS training programs for such population is limited. Likewise, people with different disabilities are able to effectively learn BLS maneuvers, although with mixed results, mainly in those regarding the CPR quality. Conclusion: People with visual, hearing disabilities or Down syndrome are able to effectively learn BLS maneuvers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.