Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37711653›Full record

ReviewMaterials today. Bio2023

Biological importance of human amniotic membrane in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Zeming Hu, Yang Luo, Renhao Ni, Yiwei Hu, Fang Yang, Tianyu Du, Yabin Zhu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Materials today. Bio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Special Issue "Recent Advances in Wound Healing: 2nd Edition".International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Supercritical COMaterials today. Bio · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zeming HuHealth Science Center, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China.
Yang LuoHealth Science Center, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China.
Renhao NiHealth Science Center, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China.
Yiwei HuHealth Science Center, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China.
Fang YangHealth Science Center, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China.
Tianyu DuHealth Science Center, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China.
Yabin ZhuHealth Science Center, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human amniotic membrane (hAM) is the innermost layer of the placenta. Its distinctive structure and the biological and physical characteristics make it a highly biocompatible material in a variety of regenerative medicine applications. It also acts as a supply of bioactive factors and cells, which indicate the advantages over other tissues. In this review, we firstly discussed the biological properties of hAM-derived cells

Indexed as

Human amniotic membraneModificationsPropertiesRegenerative medicineTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID37711653
PMCPMC10498009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.