Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37711636›Full record

ReviewClinical kidney journal2023

Partnering with patients and caregivers to enrich research and care in kidney disease: values and strategies.

Rosanna Cazzolli, Amanda Sluiter, Chandana Guha, Brooke Huuskes, Germaine Wong, Jonathan C Craig, Allison Jaure, Nicole Scholes-Robertson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical kidney journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rosanna CazzolliSydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Amanda SluiterSydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Chandana GuhaSydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Brooke HuuskesCentre for Cardiovascular Biology and Disease Research, School of Agriculture, Biomedicine and Environment, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Germaine WongSydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jonathan C CraigCentre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Allison JaureSydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Nicole Scholes-RobertsonSydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8260-0453

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient and caregiver involvement broadens the scope of new knowledge generated from research and can enhance the relevance, quality and impact of research on clinical practice and health outcomes. Incorporating the perspectives of people with lived experience of chronic kidney disease (CKD) affords new insights into the design of interventions, study methodology, data analysis and implementation and has value for patients, healthcare professionals and researchers alike. However, patient involvement in CKD research has been limited and data on which to inform best practice is scarce. A number of frameworks have been developed for involving patients and caregivers in research in CKD and in health research more broadly. These frameworks provide an overall conceptual structure to guide the planning and implementation of research partnerships and describe values that are essential and strategies considered best practice when working with diverse stakeholder groups. This article aims to provide a summary of the strategies most widely used to support multistakeholder partnerships, the different ways patients and caregivers can be involved in research and the methods used to amalgamate diverse and at times conflicting points of view.

Indexed as

chronic kidney diseaseconsensus techniquesconsumer involvementinvolvement frameworksmultistakeholder researchpatient and caregiver involvement

Identifiers

PMID37711636
PMCPMC10497378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.