Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37711634›Full record

ReviewClinical kidney journal2023

Decision aids to assist patients and professionals in choosing the right treatment for kidney failure.

Hilary L Bekker, Anna E Winterbottom, Teresa Gavaruzzi, Jeanette Finderup, Andrew Mooney

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical kidney journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06842069 (The Effect of Structured Education and Decision Support on Patient Outcomes for Patients Starting Dialysis Treatment in Emergency Conditions), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06842069 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of Structured Education and Decision Support on Patient Outcomes for Patients Starting Dialysis Treatment in Emergency Conditions

TypeinterventionalSponsorAtlas UniversityRan2018 to 2018Enrolled86ConditionsKidney Disease, ChronicArmsDecision Aid Supported Education, Dialysis Education for Urgent Dialysis Start Patient
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Shared decision-making in radiotherapy for rectal cancer - A systematic review.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hilary L BekkerLeeds Unit of Complex Intervention Development (LUCID), Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1978-5795
Anna E WinterbottomLeeds Unit of Complex Intervention Development (LUCID), Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1206-9430
Teresa GavaruzziDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Jeanette FinderupResCenPI - Research Centre for Patient Involvement, Aarhus University, Aarhus and the Central Denmark Region, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2646-0227
Andrew MooneyLeeds Unit of Complex Intervention Development (LUCID), Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Kidney services vary in the way they involve people with kidney failure (PwKF) in treatment decisions as management needs change. We discuss how decision-science applications support proactively PwKF to make informed decisions between treatment options with kidney professionals. Methods: A conceptual review of findings about decision making and use of decision aids in kidney services, synthesized with reference to: the Making Informed Decisions-Individually and Together (MIND-IT) multiple stakeholder decision makers framework; and the Medical Research Council-Complex Intervention Development and Evaluation research framework. Results: This schema represents the different types of decision aids that support PwKF and professional reasoning as they manage kidney disease individually and together; adjustments at micro, meso and macro levels supports integration in practice. Conclusion: Innovating services to meet clinical guidelines on enhancing shared decision making processes means enabling all stakeholders to use decision aids to meet their goals within kidney pathways at individual, service and organizational levels.

Indexed as

kidney treatmentpatient decision aidsshared decision making

Identifiers

PMID37711634
PMCPMC10497379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.