Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37711583›Full record

ArticleConservation physiology2023

Plant physiological indicators for optimizing conservation outcomes.

Leonie Schönbeck, Marc Arteaga, Humera Mirza, Mitchell Coleman, Denise Mitchell, Xinyi Huang, Haile Ortiz, Louis S Santiago

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Leonie SchönbeckDepartment of Botany & Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
Marc ArteagaDepartment of Botany & Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
Humera MirzaDepartment of Botany & Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
Mitchell ColemanDepartment of Botany & Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
Denise MitchellDepartment of Botany & Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
Xinyi HuangDepartment of Botany & Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
Haile OrtizDepartment of Botany & Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
Louis S SantiagoDepartment of Botany & Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5994-6122

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant species of concern often occupy narrow habitat ranges, making climate change an outsized potential threat to their conservation and restoration. Understanding the physiological status of a species during stress has the potential to elucidate current risk and provide an outlook on population maintenance. However, the physiological status of a plant can be difficult to interpret without a reference point, such as the capacity to tolerate stress before loss of function, or mortality. We address the application of plant physiology to conservation biology by distinguishing between two physiological approaches that together determine plant status in relation to environmental conditions and evaluate the capacity to avoid stress-induced loss of function. Plant physiological status indices, such as instantaneous rates of photosynthetic gas exchange, describe the level of physiological activity in the plant and are indicative of physiological health. When such measurements are combined with a reference point that reflects the maximum value or environmental limits of a parameter, such as the temperature at which photosynthesis begins to decline due to high temperature stress, we can better diagnose the proximity to potentially damaging thresholds. Here, we review a collection of useful plant status and reference point measurements related to photosynthesis, water relations and mineral nutrition, which can contribute to plant conservation physiology. We propose that these measurements can serve as important additional information to more commonly used phenological and morphological parameters, as the proposed parameters will reveal early warning signals before they are visible. We discuss their implications in the context of changing temperature, water and nutrient supply.

Indexed as

Droughtnutrientsphotosynthesisplant eco-physiologyplant hydraulicstemperature

Identifiers

PMID37711583
PMCPMC10498484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.