ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2023
High-Resolution 3D MRI With Deep Generative Networks via Novel Slice-Profile Transformation Super-Resolution.
Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- RAVEN: Robust, generalizable, multi-resolution structural MRI upsampling using Autoencoders.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Free-breathing pediatric cardiac dark-blood imaging with reverse double inversion-recovery and single-shot deep learning reconstruction.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- BioCompNet: A Deep Learning Workflow Enabling Automated Body Composition Analysis toward Precision Management of Cardiometabolic Disorders.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Development of machine learning models for forecasting the strength of resilient modulus of subgrade soil: genetic and artificial neural network approaches.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Motion Artifact Reduction Using U-Net Model with Three-Dimensional Simulation-Based Datasets for Brain Magnetic Resonance Images.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- RAVEN: Robust, generalizable, multi-resolution structural MRI upsampling using autoencoders.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences, such as 3D turbo or fast spin-echo (TSE/FSE) imaging, are clinically desirable but suffer from long scanning time-related blurring when reformatted into preferred orientations. Instead, multi-slice two-dimensional (2D) TSE imaging is commonly used because of its high in-plane resolution but is limited clinically by poor through-plane resolution due to elongated voxels and the inability to generate multi-planar reformations due to staircase artifacts. Therefore, multiple 2D TSE scans are acquired in various orthogonal imaging planes, increasing the overall MRI scan time. In this study, we propose a novel slice-profile transformation super-resolution (SPTSR) framework with deep generative learning for through-plane super-resolution (SR) of multi-slice 2D TSE imaging. The deep generative networks were trained by synthesized low-resolution training input via slice-profile downsampling (SP-DS), and the trained networks inferred on the slice profile convolved (SP-conv) testing input for 5.5x through-plane SR. The network output was further slice-profile deconvolved (SP-deconv) to achieve an isotropic super-resolution. Compared to SMORE SR method and the networks trained by conventional downsampling, our SPTSR framework demonstrated the best overall image quality from 50 testing cases, evaluated by two abdominal radiologists. The quantitative analysis cross-validated the expert reader study results. 3D simulation experiments confirmed the quantitative improvement of the proposed SPTSR and the effectiveness of the SP-deconv step, compared to 3D ground-truths. Ablation studies were conducted on the individual contributions of SP-DS and SP-conv, networks structure, training dataset size, and different slice profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.