Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37711324›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023

Repeated measures ANOVA and adjusted

María J Blanca, Jaume Arnau, F Javier García-Castro, Rafael Alarcón, Roser Bono

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Caffeine's influence on vertical jump height: a real-life collegiate student-athlete approach.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2025
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

María J BlancaDepartment of Psychobiology and Behavioral Sciences Methodology, University of Malaga, Málaga, Spain.
Jaume ArnauDepartment of Social Psychology and Quantitative Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
F Javier García-CastroDepartment of Psychology, Universidad Loyola Andalucia, Seville, Spain.
Rafael AlarcónDepartment of Psychobiology and Behavioral Sciences Methodology, University of Malaga, Málaga, Spain.
Roser BonoDepartment of Social Psychology and Quantitative Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: One-way repeated measures ANOVA requires sphericity. Research indicates that violation of this assumption has an important impact on Type I error. Although more advanced alternative procedures exist, most classical texts recommend the use of adjusted Methods: The aim of this simulation study was to analyze the performance of the Results: Overall, the results showed that the Discussion: If different statistical conclusions follow from application of the two tests, we recommend using

Indexed as

Greenhouse-Geisser adjustmentHuynh-Feldt adjustmentMauchly testpowerrobustness

Identifiers

PMID37711324
PMCPMC10499170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.