Syndromic Panel Testing Among Patients With Infectious Diarrhea: The Challenge of Interpreting

Background: Including Methods: We conducted a retrospective study to determine the frequency at which clinicians characterize PTP and disease severity in adult patients who test positive for CD by GIPCR. We organized subjects into cohorts based on the status of their CD PCR, glutamate dehydrogenase enzyme immunoassay (GDH), and toxin A/B detection, as well as by high, moderate, or low CD PTP. We used multivariable regression models to describe predictors of toxin positivity. Results: We identified 483 patients with positive CD PCR targets. Only 22% were positive for both GDH and CD toxin. Among patients with a low PTP for CDI, 11% demonstrated a positive CD toxin result compared to 63% of patients with a high PTP. A low clinician PTP for CD infection (CDI) correlated with a negative CD toxin result compared to cases of moderate-to-high PTP for CDI (odds ratio, 0.19 [95% confidence interval, .10-.36]). Up to 64% of patients with negative GDH and CD toxin received CD treatment. Only receipt of prior antibiotics, fever, and a moderate-to-high clinician PTP were statistically significant predictors of toxin positivity. Conclusions: Patients with a positive CD PCR were likely to receive treatment regardless of PTP or CD toxin results. We recommend that CD positivity on GIPCR be interpreted with caution, particularly in the setting of a low PTP.