Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37711193›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Induction therapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab followed by consolidative chemoradiation as organ-sparing treatment in urothelial bladder cancer: study protocol of the INDIBLADE trial.

C F Stockem, J J J Mellema, B W G van Rhijn, T N Boellaard, M L van Montfoort, S Balduzzi, J L Boormans, M Franckena, R P Meijer, D G J Robbrecht and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05200988 (A Phase 2 Clinical Study to Assess Efficacy of Induction Ipilimumab/Nivolumab to Spare the Bladder in Urothelial Bladder Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05200988 phase2active not recruitingnot on this map

A Phase 2 Clinical Study to Assess Efficacy of Induction Ipilimumab/Nivolumab to Spare the Bladder in Urothelial Bladder Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteRan2022 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsUrothelial Carcinoma, Bladder CancerArmsIpilimumab + nivolumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

C F StockemDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
J J J MellemaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
B W G van RhijnDepartment of Oncological Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
T N BoellaardDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
M L van MontfoortDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
S BalduzziDepartment of Statistics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
J L BoormansDepartment of Oncological Urology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
M FranckenaDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
R P MeijerDepartment of Oncological Urology, University Medical Center (UMC), Utrecht, Netherlands.
D G J RobbrechtDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
B B M SuelmannDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center (UMC), Utrecht, Netherlands.
E E SchaakeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
M S van der HeijdenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Studies that assessed the efficacy of pre-operative immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in locally advanced urothelial cancer of the bladder showed encouraging pathological complete response rates, suggesting that a bladder-sparing approach may be a viable option in a subset of patients. Chemoradiation is an alternative for radical cystectomy with similar oncological outcomes, but is still mainly used in selected patients with organ-confined tumors or patients ineligible to undergo radical cystectomy. We propose to sequentially administer ICB and chemoradiation to patients with (locally advanced) muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Methods: The INDIBLADE trial is an investigator-initiated, single-arm, multicenter phase 2 trial. Fifty patients with cT2-4aN0-2M0 urothelial bladder cancer will be treated with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg on day 1, ipilimumab 3 mg/kg plus nivolumab 1 mg/kg on day 22, and nivolumab 3 mg/kg on day 43 followed by chemoradiation. The primary endpoint is the bladder-intact event-free survival (BI-EFS). Events include: local or distant recurrence, salvage cystectomy, death and switch to platinum-based chemotherapy. We will also evaluate the potential of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the bladder to identify non-responders, and we will assess the clearance of circulating tumor DNA as a biomarker for ICB treatment response. Discussion: This is the first trial in which the efficacy of induction combination ICB followed by chemoradiation is being evaluated to provide bladder-preservation in patients with (locally advanced) urothelial bladder cancer. Clinical Trial Registration: The INDIBLADE trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov on January 21, 2022 (NCT05200988).

Indexed as

bladder preservationchemoradiationimmune checkpoint blockadeMuscle-invasive bladder cancertrimodal therapy

Identifiers

PMID37711193
PMCPMC10498281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.