ArticleRoyal Society open science2023
Using ChatGPT for human-computer interaction research: a primer.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Social robots: a meta-analysis of learning outcomes.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2025Pooled it
- The use and methodological reporting of large language models in qualitative research: a scoping review.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- Article
- AI-Based Assessment of Non-Technical Skills in Prehospital Simulations: A Comparative Validation Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluating the ability of large Language models to predict human social decisions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- "Having providers who are trained and have empathy is life-saving": Improving primary care communication through thematic analysis with ChatGPT and human expertise.PEC innovation · 2025Article
- Complementing but Not Replacing: Comparing the Impacts of GPT-4 and Native-Speaker Interaction on Chinese L2 Writing Outcomes.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- An open-source reproducible chess robot for human-robot interaction research.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2025Article
- Article
- Urban walkability through different lenses: A comparative study of GPT-4o and human perceptions.PloS one · 2025Article
- Use of ChatGPT to Explore Gender and Geographic Disparities in Scientific Peer Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Human Factors and Organizational Issues in Health Informatics: Review of Recent Developments and Advances.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2024Review
- ChatGPT in surgery: a revolutionary innovation?Surgery today · 2024Review
- ChatGPT for Automated Qualitative Research: Content Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Harnessing ChatGPT for Thematic Analysis: Are We Ready?Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Putting ChatGPT vision (GPT-4V) to the test: risk perception in traffic images.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Empirical assessment of ChatGPT's answering capabilities in natural science and engineering.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Multimedia design for learner interest and achievement: a visual guide to pharmacology.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Using a Stakeholder Analysis to Implement the Belgian One Health National Report for Antimicrobial Use and Resistance.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Comprehensiveness, Accuracy, and Readability of Exercise Recommendations Provided by an AI-Based Chatbot: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR medical education · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ChatGPT could serve as a tool for text analysis within the field of Human-Computer Interaction, though its validity requires investigation. This study applied ChatGPT to: (1) textbox questionnaire responses on nine augmented-reality interfaces, (2) interview data from participants who experienced these interfaces in a virtual simulator, and (3) transcribed think-aloud data of participants who viewed a real painting and its replica. Using a hierarchical approach, ChatGPT produced scores or summaries of text batches, which were then aggregated. Results showed that (1) ChatGPT generated sentiment scores of the interfaces that correlated extremely strongly (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.