ArticleACR open rheumatology2023
Identifying lupus Patient Subsets Through Immune Cell Deconvolution of Gene Expression Data in Two Atacicept Phase II Studies.
Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo use cell-based gene signatures to identify patients with systemic lupus erythematous (SLE) in the phase II/III APRIL-SLE and phase IIb ADDRESS II trials most likely to respond to atacicept.
methodsA published immune cell deconvolution algorithm based on Affymetrix gene array data was applied to whole blood gene expression from patients entering APRIL-SLE. Five distinct patient clusters were identified. Patient characteristics, biomarkers, and clinical response to atacicept were assessed per cluster. A modified immune cell deconvolution algorithm was developed based on RNA sequencing data and applied to ADDRESS II data to identify similar patient clusters and their responses.
resultsPatients in APRIL-SLE (N = 105) were segregated into the following five clusters (P1-5) characterized by dominant cell subset signatures: high neutrophils, T helper cells and natural killer (NK) cells (P1), high plasma cells and activated NK cells (P2), high B cells and neutrophils (P3), high B cells and low neutrophils (P4), or high activated dendritic cells, activated NK cells, and neutrophils (P5). Placebo- and atacicept-treated patients in clusters P2,4,5 had markedly higher British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A/B flare rates than those in clusters P1,3, with a greater treatment effect of atacicept on lowering flares in clusters P2,4,5. In ADDRESS II, placebo-treated patients from P2,4,5 were less likely to be SLE Responder Index (SRI)-4, SRI-6, and BILAG-Based Combined Lupus Assessment responders than those in P1,3; the response proportions again suggested lower placebo effect and a greater treatment differential for atacicept in P2,4,5.
conclusionThis exploratory analysis indicates larger differences between placebo- and atacicept-treated patients with SLE in a molecularly defined patient subset.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.