Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37710394›Full record

ArticleQualitative health research2023

Mental Health Staff's Perspectives on Tapering of Antipsychotic Medication: A Focus Group Study.

Kickan Roed, Niels Buus, Jimmi Nielsen, Puk S Christensen, Julie Midtgaard

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Qualitative health research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kickan RoedMental Health Centre Glostrup, Copenhagen University Hospital - Mental Health Services CPH, Centre for Applied Research in Mental Health Care, Glostrup, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2926-6983
Niels BuusDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jimmi NielsenMental Health Centre Glostrup, Copenhagen University Hospital - Mental Health Services CPH, Centre for Applied Research in Mental Health Care, Glostrup, Denmark.
Puk S ChristensenMental Health Centre Ballerup, Copenhagen University Hospital - Mental Health Services CPH, Ballrup, Denmark.
Julie MidtgaardMental Health Centre Glostrup, Copenhagen University Hospital - Mental Health Services CPH, Centre for Applied Research in Mental Health Care, Glostrup, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2381-2127
Mental Health Services · DKAarhus University · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contemporary practices of long-term antipsychotic maintenance treatment for schizophrenia are being challenged, and clinicians must consider the possibilities of reducing long-term maintenance use. However, research indicates that people with schizophrenia receive little support from mental health staff to reduce antipsychotic medication. This article reports a study which aimed to investigate interdisciplinary mental health staff's accounts of tapering of antipsychotic medication and to explore different positions that mental health staff assign to themselves and others. Six focus groups were conducted with 39 mental health staff from outpatient clinics, inpatient units, forensic mental health units, and community mental health services. The data analysis combined analyses of the interactions during focus groups and the thematic content. Results were considered from a discourse analytic perspective considering the function and consequence of accounts applied by the mental health staff. The mental health staff accounted for their perspectives on tapering from the following three distinctive positions: 1) No, patients will eventually realize that they need the medication, 2) Yes, but tapering means running a big risk of relapse in symptoms, and 3) Yes, we need to welcome risks to support personal recovery. Our findings indicated that there was reluctance among interdisciplinary mental health staff to let service users make decisions and limited possibilities for people with schizophrenia to have their request for tapering of their antipsychotic medication met by mental health staff.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsSchizophreniaChronic DiseaseFocus GroupsHumansMental HealthAntipsychotic Agentsantipsychotic medicationmental health staffqualitative studyschizophreniatapering

Identifiers

PMID37710394
PMCPMC10626979
OpenAlexW4386756870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.