Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37710312›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2023

Lifting of the 1,000 wheat exome project SNPs from Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring assembly RefSeq v1.0 to RefSeq v2.1.

Akshaya Vasudevan, Sylvie Cloutier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Akshaya VasudevanAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa Research and Development Centre, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0C6, Canada.
Sylvie CloutierAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa Research and Development Centre, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0C6, Canada. sylviej.cloutier@agr.gc.ca.
Ottawa Research and Development CentreOttawa University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe 1,000 wheat exome project captured the single nucleotide variants in the coding regions of a diverse set of 890 wheat accessions to analyse the contribution of introgression to adaptation of wheat. However, this highly useful single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) dataset is based on RefSeq v1.0 of the International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium (IWGSC) assembly of the bread wheat genome of Chinese Spring. This reference sequence has recently been updated using optical maps and long-read sequencing to produce the improved RefSeq v2.1. Our objective was to develop a reliable high-density SNP dataset positioned onto RefSeq v2.1 because it is the current standard reference sequence used by wheat researchers.

resultsThe 3,039,822 SNPs originally positioned on RefSeq v1.0 were projected to v2.1 using Liftoff with four different flanking regions, and 2,946,536 SNPs were consistently lifted to the same location irrespective of the flanking region lengths. Of these, 2,799,166 were located on the '+' ve strand. The distribution of the SNPs across the 21 chromosomes on RefSeq v2.1 was similar to that of RefSeq v1.0. Among the SNPs that were based on unanchored scaffolds in RefSeq v1.0, 11,938 were projected to one of the 21 pseudomolecules in the upgraded assembly. This SNP dataset constitutes a much-needed standardized resource for the wheat research community.

Indexed as

ExomeTriticumChromosome MappingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideChinese Spring reference genomeLiftoffRefSeq v2.1SNP lifting

Identifiers

PMID37710312
PMCPMC10503198
OpenAlexW4386739095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.