Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37710297›Full record

ArticleChild and adolescent psychiatry and mental health2023

Short-term cognitive effects of repeated-dose esketamine in adolescents with major depressive disorder and suicidal ideation: a randomized controlled trial.

Xiaofeng Lan, Chengyu Wang, Fan Zhang, Haiyan Liu, Weicheng Li, Yanxiang Ye, Zhibo Hu, Siming Mai, Yuping Ning, Yanling Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Esketamine in depression: putative biomarkers from clinical research.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaofeng LanDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Mingxin Road #36, Liwan District, Guangzhou, 510370, China.
Chengyu WangDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Mingxin Road #36, Liwan District, Guangzhou, 510370, China.
Fan ZhangDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Mingxin Road #36, Liwan District, Guangzhou, 510370, China.
Haiyan LiuDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Mingxin Road #36, Liwan District, Guangzhou, 510370, China.
Weicheng LiDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Mingxin Road #36, Liwan District, Guangzhou, 510370, China.
Yanxiang YeDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Mingxin Road #36, Liwan District, Guangzhou, 510370, China.
Zhibo HuDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Mingxin Road #36, Liwan District, Guangzhou, 510370, China.
Siming MaiDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Mingxin Road #36, Liwan District, Guangzhou, 510370, China.
Yuping NingDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Mingxin Road #36, Liwan District, Guangzhou, 510370, China. ningjeny@126.com.
Yanling ZhouDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Mingxin Road #36, Liwan District, Guangzhou, 510370, China. zhouylivy@aliyun.com.
Guangzhou Medical University · CNSouth China University of Technology · CN

Funding

Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2022A1515011567Guangzhou Health Science and Technology Project 20231A010038Guangzhou Science and Technology Planning Project 202103000032Guangzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine and Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Technology Project 20232A010013Science and Technology Plan Project of Guangzhou 2023A03J0842Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou Liwan District 202201003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKetamine and its enantiomer have rapid and robust effects on depressive symptom and suicidal ideation. Little is known about their cognitive effects in adolescents. We aimed to evaluate the short-term effect of esketamine on cognition in adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD) and suicidal ideation.

methodIn this randomized-controlled trial, 51 participants aged 13-18 with MDD and suicidal ideation received three intravenous infusions of either esketamine (0.25 mg/kg) or midazolam (0.02 mg/kg). Four dimensions of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB), including processing speed, working memory, verbal learning and visual learning, were assessed at Days 0, 6 and 12.

resultsIn the linear mixed model, a significant time main effect (F = 12.803, P < 0.001), drug main effect (F = 6.607, P = 0.013), and interaction effect (F = 3.315, P = 0.041) was found in processing speed. Other dimensions including working memory and verbal learning showed significant time main effect (all P < 0.05), but no significant drug or interaction effect (all P > 0.05). Esketamine group showed improvement in processing speed from baseline to Days 6 and 12, and working memory from baseline to Day 12 (all P < 0.05). The generalized estimation equation showed no significant association between baseline cognition and antidepressant or antisuicidal effect (both P > 0.05).

conclusionsThe present study suggested that three-dose subanesthetic esketamine infusions did not harm cognition among adolescents with MDD and suicidal ideation. Instead, esketamine may be associated with improvement in processing speed.

trial registrationThis trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry ( http://www.chictr.org.cn , ChiCTR2000041232).

Indexed as

AdolescentCognitionDepressionEsketamineSuicidal ideation

Identifiers

PMID37710297
PMCPMC10503003
OpenAlexW4386732609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.