ArticleClinical epigenetics2023
Evaluation of commercial kits for isolation and bisulfite conversion of circulating cell-free tumor DNA from blood.
Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chronological age estimation from DNA methylation data in a Serbian population: a SNaPshot-based forensic model.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Early Breast Cancer: Current and Emerging Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers.Cancers · 2026Review
- Microbial cell-free DNA for rapid pathogen identification in clinical diagnostics: a proof of concept study.Genome medicine · 2026Article
- Liquid Biopsy in Modern Oncology: Advances, Challenges, and Future Perspectives in Early Cancer Detection, Minimal Residual Disease, and Dynamic Patient Monitoring.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- HPV-Driven Cervical Carcinogenesis: Genetic and Epigenetic Mechanisms and Diagnostic Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- DNA Methylation Analyses of Tissue Samples and Cell-Free DNA by Droplet Digital PCR.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Review
- Advancements in DNA methylation technologies and their application in cancer diagnosis.Epigenetics · 2025Review
- A Novel Microfluidic Platform for Circulating Tumor Cell Identification in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.Micromachines · 2025Article
- Preanalytical variables and analytes in liquid biopsy approach for brain tumors: A comprehensive review and recommendations from the RANO Group and the Brain Liquid Biopsy Consortium.Neuro-oncology · 2025Review
- Review
- Comparison of enzymatic and bisulfite conversion of circulating cell-free tumor DNA for DNA methylation analyses.Clinical epigenetics · 2025Article
- International society of liquid biopsy (ISLB) perspective on minimal requirements for ctDNA testing in solid tumors.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2025Review
- Advancing Personalized Medicine in Alzheimer's Disease: Liquid Biopsy Epigenomics UnveilInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Circulating tumor DNA to monitor treatment response in solid tumors and advance precision oncology.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Review
- Is There an Ace Up One's Sleeve in the Preanalytical Phase of the Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis?BioFactors (Oxford, England)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDNA methylation biomarkers in circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) have great clinical potential for cancer management. Most methods for DNA methylation analysis require bisulfite conversion, causing DNA degradation and loss. This is particularly challenging for cfDNA, which is naturally fragmented and normally present in low amounts. The aim of the present study was to identify an optimal combination of cfDNA isolation and bisulfite conversion kits for downstream analysis of DNA methylation biomarkers in plasma.
resultsOf the five tested bisulfite conversion kits (EpiJET Bisulfite Conversion Kit, EpiTect Plus DNA Bisulfite Kit (EpiTect), EZ DNA Methylation-Direct Kit, Imprint DNA Modification Kit (Imprint) and Premium Bisulfite Kit), the highest and lowest DNA yield and recovery were achieved using the EpiTect kit and the Imprint kit, respectively, with more than double the amount of DNA for the EpiTect kit. Of the three tested cfDNA isolation kits (Maxwell RSC ccfDNA Plasma Kit, QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit (CNA) and QIAamp MinElute ccfDNA Mini Kit), the CNA kit yielded around twice as much cfDNA compared to the two others kits, although with more high molecular weight DNA present. When comparing various combinations of cfDNA isolation kits and bisulfite conversion kits, the CNA kit and the EpiTect kit were identified as the best-performing combination, resulting in the highest yield of bisulfite converted cfDNA from normal plasma, as measured by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). As a proof of principle, this kit combination was used to process plasma samples from 13 colorectal cancer patients for subsequent ddPCR methylation analysis of BCAT1 and IKZF1. Methylation of BCAT1 and/or IKZF1 was identified in 6/10 (60%) stage IV patients and 1/3 (33%) stage III patients.
conclusionsBased on a thorough evaluation of five bisulfite conversion kits and three cfDNA isolation kits, both individually and in combination, the CNA kit and the EpiTect kit were identified as the best-performing kit combination, with highest DNA yield and recovery across a range of DNA input amounts. The combination was successfully used for detection of clinically relevant DNA methylation biomarkers in plasma from cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.