ArticleBMC neuroscience2023
A spine segmentation method based on scene aware fusion network.
Article in BMC neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning assisted segmentation of the lumbar intervertebral disc: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Pooled it
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Spine MRI.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntervertebral disc herniation, degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, and other lumbar spine diseases can occur across most age groups. MRI examination is the most commonly used detection method for lumbar spine lesions with its good soft tissue image resolution. However, the diagnosis accuracy is highly dependent on the experience of the diagnostician, leading to subjective errors caused by diagnosticians or differences in diagnostic criteria for multi-center studies in different hospitals, and inefficient diagnosis. These factors necessitate the standardized interpretation and automated classification of lumbar spine MRI to achieve objective consistency. In this research, a deep learning network based on SAFNet is proposed to solve the above challenges.
methodsIn this research, low-level features, mid-level features, and high-level features of spine MRI are extracted. ASPP is used to process the high-level features. The multi-scale feature fusion method is used to increase the scene perception ability of the low-level features and mid-level features. The high-level features are further processed using global adaptive pooling and Sigmoid function to obtain new high-level features. The processed high-level features are then point-multiplied with the mid-level features and low-level features to obtain new high-level features. The new high-level features, low-level features, and mid-level features are all sampled to the same size and concatenated in the channel dimension to output the final result.
resultsThe DSC of SAFNet for segmenting 17 vertebral structures among 5 folds are 79.46 ± 4.63%, 78.82 ± 7.97%, 81.32 ± 3.45%, 80.56 ± 5.47%, and 80.83 ± 3.48%, with an average DSC of 80.32 ± 5.00%. The average DSC was 80.32 ± 5.00%. Compared to existing methods, our SAFNet provides better segmentation results and has important implications for the diagnosis of spinal and lumbar diseases.
conclusionsThis research proposes SAFNet, a highly accurate and robust spine segmentation deep learning network capable of providing effective anatomical segmentation for diagnostic purposes. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method and its potential for improving radiological diagnosis accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.