Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37710188›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2023

Medical image diagnosis based on adaptive Hybrid Quantum CNN.

Naim Ajlouni, Adem Özyavaş, Mustafa Takaoğlu, Faruk Takaoğlu, Firas Ajlouni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Naim AjlouniFaculty of Engineering, Istanbul Atlas University, 34295, Istanbul, Türkiye. naim.ajlouni@atlas.edu.tr.
Adem ÖzyavaşFaculty of Engineering, Istanbul Atlas University, 34295, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Mustafa TakaoğluThe Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK), BİLGEM, Kocaeli, Türkiye.
Faruk TakaoğluThe Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK), BİLGEM, Kocaeli, Türkiye.
Firas AjlouniDepartment of Computer Science, Lancashire College of Further Education, Accrington, BB5 OHJ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hybrid quantum systems have shown promise in image classification by combining the strengths of both classical and quantum algorithms. These systems leverage the parallel processing power of quantum computers to perform complex computations while utilizing classical algorithms to handle the vast amounts of data involved in imaging. The hybrid approach is intended to improve accuracy and speed compared to traditional classical methods. Further research and development in this area can revolutionize the way medical images are classified and help improve patient diagnosis and treatment. The use of Conventional Neural Networks (CNN) for the classification and diagnosis of medical images using big datasets requires, in most cases, the use of special high-performance computing machines, which are very expensive and hard to access by most researchers. A new form of Machine Learning (ML), Quantum machine learning (QML), is being introduced as an emerging strategy to overcome this problem. A hybrid quantum-classical CNN uses both quantum and classical convolution layers designed to use a parameterized quantum circuit. This means that the computing model utilizes a quantum circuits approach to construct QML algorithms, which are then used to transform the quantum state to extract image hidden features. This computational acceleration is expected to achieve better algorithm performance than classical CNNs. This study intends to evaluate the performance of a Hybrid Quantum CNN (HQCNN) against a conventional CNN. This is followed by some optimizer modifications for both proposed and classical CNN methods to investigate the possible further improvement of their performance. The optimizer modification is based on forcing the optimizer to be directly adaptive to model accuracy. The optimizer adaptiveness is based on the development of an optimizer with a loss base adaptive momentum. Several algorithms are developed to achieve the above-mentioned goals, including CNN, QCNN, CNN with the adaptive optimizer, and QCNN with the Adaptive optimizer. The four algorithms are tested against a Kaggle brain dataset containing over 7000 samples. The test results show the hybrid quantum circuit algorithm outperformed the conventional CNN algorithm. The performance of both algorithms was further improved by using a fully adaptive SGD optimizer.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsNeural Networks, ComputerBrainHumansMachine LearningMotionAdaptive momentumCNNHybrid QCNNMedical diagnosisNeural networksParameterized Quantum Circuits ‘PQC’

Identifiers

PMID37710188
PMCPMC10500912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.