ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023
Integration and deconvolution methodology deciphering prognosis-related signatures in lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to establish a risk prediction model based on prognosis-related genes (PRGs) and clinicopathological factors, and investigate the biological activities of PRGs in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD).
methodsRisk score signatures were developed by employing multiple algorithms and their amalgamations. A predictive model for overall survival was established through the integration of risk score signatures and several clinicopathological parameters. A comprehensive single-cell atlas, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and gene set variation analysis (GSVA) were used to investigate the biological activities of prognosis-related genes in LUAD.
resultsA risk prediction model was established based on 16 PRGs, exhibiting robust performance in predicting overall survival. The single-cell analysis revealed that epithelial cells were primarily associated with worse survival of LUAD, and PRGs were predominantly enriched in malignant epithelial cells and influenced epithelial cell growth and progression. Furthermore, GSEA and GSVA analysis showed that PRGs were involved in tumor pathways such as epithelial-mesenchymal transition, hypoxia and KRAS_UP, and high GSVA scores are correlated with worse outcome in LUAD patients.
conclusionsThe constructed risk prediction model in this study offers clinicians a valuable tool for tailoring treatment strategies of LUAD and provides a comprehensive interpretation on the biological activities of PRGs in LUAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.