ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2025
Prognostic implications of baseline rhythm during catheter ablation for atrial tachycardia.
Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Basics in the EP lab-how and when to pace?]Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2026Review
- [The EHRA/HRS/APHRS/LAHRS/AEPC consensus statement on the management of atrial tachycardias : Implications of the SMART-AT 10-point plan for clinical practice and healthcare structures].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2026Article
- Management of patients with atrial tachycardia: a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC, endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC).Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Safety and Outcomes of Catheter Ablation for Consecutive Atrial Tachycardia in Elderly Patients After Previous Cardiac Interventions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAtrial tachycardias (AT) occurring in patients after previous atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation are increasingly observed in clinical practice. Catheter ablation is the treatment of choice but an optimal workflow to improve patient outcome has not been defined. The purpose of this study was to assess procedural and clinical outcome depending on baseline rhythm at the beginning of AT ablation.
methodsA total of 380 patients (69 (61-75) years, 56.6% male) who underwent catheter ablation for consecutive AT after previous AF ablation were studied.
resultsAt the beginning of the procedure, 140 patients (36.8%) presented in sinus rhythm (SR), 208 (54.7%) with AT and 32 (8.4%) with AF. Patients in SR or with AT underwent shorter procedures (173 (132-213) minutes vs. 161 (120-203) minutes vs. 226 (154-249) minutes; p = 0.002) with more frequent termination to SR (87.9% vs. 81.3% vs. 56.3%; p < 0.001) than patients with AF. Acute procedural success did not differ between patients in SR or with AT but was higher compared to those with AF (96.4% vs. 97.1% vs. 87.5%; p = 0.033). During a follow-up of 290 (181-680) days, patients in baseline SR experienced arrhythmia recurrences less often (36.4% vs. 49.5% vs. 68.8%; p = 0.002) than patients with AT or AF.
conclusionBaseline rhythm during AT ablation predicts procedural and clinical outcome. Whereas acute procedural success does not differ between patients in SR or with AT, patients presenting in SR have a more favorable mid-term success rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37710016What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.