Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37710008›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Influence of gelatin type on physicochemical properties of electrospun nanofibers.

Bruna Silva de Farias, Francisca Zuchoski Rizzi, Eduardo Silveira Ribeiro, Patrícia Silva Diaz, Tito Roberto Sant'Anna Cadaval Junior, Guilherme Luiz Dotto, Mohammad Rizwan Khan, Salim Manoharadas, Luiz Antonio de Almeida Pinto, Glaydson Simões Dos Reis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Gelatin Adsorption onto Cellulose Nanocrystals Surfaces at Different pH: A QCM-D Study.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bruna Silva de FariasSchool of Chemistry and Food, Federal University of Rio Grande (FURG), km 8 Itália Avenue, Rio Grande, RS, 96203-900, Brazil.
Francisca Zuchoski RizziSchool of Chemistry and Food, Federal University of Rio Grande (FURG), km 8 Itália Avenue, Rio Grande, RS, 96203-900, Brazil.
Eduardo Silveira RibeiroBiotechnology Unit, Technology Development Center, Federal University of Pelotas (UFPEL), Eliseu Maciel, Capão do Leão, 96010-610, Brazil.
Patrícia Silva DiazBiotechnology Unit, Technology Development Center, Federal University of Pelotas (UFPEL), Eliseu Maciel, Capão do Leão, 96010-610, Brazil.
Tito Roberto Sant'Anna Cadaval JuniorSchool of Chemistry and Food, Federal University of Rio Grande (FURG), km 8 Itália Avenue, Rio Grande, RS, 96203-900, Brazil.
Guilherme Luiz DottoResearch Group on Adsorptive and Catalytic Process Engineering (ENGEPAC), Federal University of Santa Maria, Av. Roraima, 1000-7, Santa Maria, RS, 97105-900, Brazil.
Mohammad Rizwan KhanDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Salim ManoharadasDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Luiz Antonio de Almeida PintoSchool of Chemistry and Food, Federal University of Rio Grande (FURG), km 8 Itália Avenue, Rio Grande, RS, 96203-900, Brazil.
Glaydson Simões Dos ReisDepartment of Forest Biomaterials and Technology, Biomass Technology Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-901 83, Umeå, Sweden. glaydson.simoes.dos.reis@slu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explores the fabrication of nanofibers using different types of gelatins, including bovine, porcine, and fish gelatins. The gelatins exhibited distinct molecular weights and apparent viscosity values, leading to different entanglement behavior and nanofiber production. The electrospinning technique produced nanofibers with diameters from 47 to 274 nm. The electrospinning process induced conformational changes, reducing the overall crystallinity of the gelatin samples. However, porcine gelatin nanofibers exhibited enhanced molecular ordering. These findings highlight the potential of different gelatin types to produce nanofibers with distinct physicochemical properties. Overall, this study sheds light on the relationship between gelatin properties, electrospinning process conditions, and the resulting nanofiber characteristics, providing insights for tailored applications in various fields.

Identifiers

PMID37710008
PMCPMC10502060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.