Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37709993›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2023

Quality of Medication Cost Conversations and Interest in Future Cost Conversations Among Older Adults.

Jordan Everson, Robert J Besaw, Christine C Whitmore, T Joseph Mattingly, Anna D Sinaiko, Nancy L Keating, Nicole Senft Everson, Stacie B Dusetzina

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jordan EversonDepartment of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
Robert J BesawDepartment of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
Christine C WhitmoreDepartment of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
T Joseph MattinglyDepartment of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Anna D SinaikoDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Nancy L KeatingDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Nicole Senft EversonHealth Communication and Informatics Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Stacie B DusetzinaDepartment of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA. s.dusetzina@vanderbilt.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3907-9196
Vanderbilt University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USNational Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Everson / Dusetzina
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedication cost conversations occur less frequently than patients prefer, and it is unclear whether patients have positive experiences with them when they do occur.

objectiveTo describe patients' experiences discussing their medication costs with their health care team.

designCross-sectional survey.

settingNationally representative survey fielded in the United States in 2022 (response rate = 48.5%). PATIENTS: 1020 adults over age 65. MEASUREMENTS: Primary measures were adapted from Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers Survey visit survey v4.0 and captured patients' experiences of medication cost conversations. Additional measures captured patients' interest in future cost conversations, the type of clinicians with whom they would be comfortable discussing costs, and sociodemographic characteristics.

resultsAmong 1020 respondents who discussed medication prices with their health care team, 39.3% were 75 or older and 78.6% were non-Hispanic White. Forty-three percent of respondents indicated that their prior medication cost conversation was not easy to understand; 3% indicated their health care team was not respectful and 26% indicated their health care team was somewhat respectful during their last conversation; 48% indicated that there was not enough time. Those reporting that their prior discussion was not easy to understand or that their clinician was not definitely respectful were less likely to be interested in future discussions. Only 6% and 10% of respondents indicated being comfortable discussing medication prices with financial counselors or social workers, respectively. Few differences in responses were observed by survey participant characteristics. LIMITATIONS: This cross-sectional survey of prior experiences may be subject to recall bias.

conclusionAmong older adults who engaged in prior medication cost conversations, many report that these conversations are not easy to understand and that almost one-third of clinicians were somewhat or not respectful. Efforts to increase the frequency of medication cost conversations should consider parallel interventions to ensure the discussions are effective at informing prescribing decisions and reducing cost-related medication nonadherence.

Indexed as

Medication AdherencePhysician-Patient RelationsAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Care SurveysHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statescost conversationsmedication costspatient experience

Identifiers

PMID37709993
PMCPMC10713949
OpenAlexW4386732677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.