Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37709933›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2023

A randomized trial of a mobile health intervention to augment cardiac rehabilitation.

Jessica R Golbus, Kashvi Gupta, Rachel Stevens, V Swetha E Jeganathan, Evan Luff, Jieru Shi, Walter Dempsey, Thomas Boyden, Bhramar Mukherjee, Sarah Kohnstamm and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. A cardiac-rehab home-based mHealth program to improve physical activity in patients with coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. A Robust Mixed-Effects Bandit Algorithm for Assessing Mobile Health Interventions.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica R GolbusDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. jgolbus@med.umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9538-3926
Kashvi GuptaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Rachel StevensDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
V Swetha E JeganathanDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Evan LuffDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jieru ShiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Walter DempseyDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Thomas BoydenDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Bhramar MukherjeeSchool of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Sarah KohnstammDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Vlad TaralungaCareEvolution, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-0555-8967
Vik KheterpalCareEvolution, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4752-4229
Susan MurphyDepartments of Statistics & Computer Science, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Predrag KlasnjaSchool of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Sachin KheterpalDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Brahmajee K NallamothuDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
University of Michigan · USCareEvolution (United States) · USHarvard University · USSpectrum Health · USUniversity of Missouri–Kansas City · US

Funding

Pilot and Mentoring CoreP50DA054039 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LINDA M COLLINS, SUSAN A MURPHY · 2021 to 2026
$18.2M
TR&D3 - Rapid Translation of AI-powered Temporally Precise mHealth Interventions via Efficient and Embeddable Trustworthy Biomarker ImplementationsP41EB028242 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS · PI James M. Rehg · 2020 to 2026
$9.5M
MObile health interVention to INcrease activity in Heart Failure (MOVIN-HF)K23HL168220 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Jessica Rachel Golbus · 2023 to 2026
$730k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL168220NHLBI NIH HHS L30 HL143700NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB028242NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA054039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mobile health (mHealth) interventions may enhance positive health behaviors, but randomized trials evaluating their efficacy are uncommon. Our goal was to determine if a mHealth intervention augmented and extended benefits of center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for physical activity levels at 6-months. We delivered a randomized clinical trial to low and moderate risk patients with a compatible smartphone enrolled in CR at two health systems. All participants received a compatible smartwatch and usual CR care. Intervention participants received a mHealth intervention that included a just-in-time-adaptive intervention (JITAI) as text messages. The primary outcome was change in remote 6-minute walk distance at 6-months stratified by device type. Here we report the results for 220 participants enrolled in the study (mean [SD]: age 59.6 [10.6] years; 67 [30.5%] women). For our primary outcome at 6 months, there is no significant difference in the change in 6 min walk distance across smartwatch types (Intervention versus control: +31.1 meters Apple Watch, -7.4 meters Fitbit; p = 0.28). Secondary outcomes show no difference in mean step counts between the first and final weeks of the study, but a change in 6 min walk distance at 3 months for Fitbit users. Amongst patients enrolled in center-based CR, a mHealth intervention did not improve 6-month outcomes but suggested differences at 3 months in some users.

Identifiers

PMID37709933
PMCPMC10502072
OpenAlexW4386736598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.