Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37709852›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Membrane fouling monitoring by 3ω sensing.

Mads Koustrup Jørgensen, Frederikke Kildeberg Paulsen, Anders Bentien, Astrid Ræbild Kjul, Maiken Poulsen, Louise Mailund Mikkelsen, Nikitha Thavaneswaran, Simon Abildgaard Hansen, Pernille Krogsager Jensen, Jacob Andersen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mads Koustrup JørgensenCenter for Membrane Technology, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, 9220, Aalborg East, Denmark. mkj@bio.aau.dk.
Frederikke Kildeberg PaulsenCenter for Membrane Technology, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, 9220, Aalborg East, Denmark.
Anders BentienDepartment of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Aarhus University, Åbogade 40, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Astrid Ræbild KjulCenter for Membrane Technology, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, 9220, Aalborg East, Denmark.
Maiken PoulsenCenter for Membrane Technology, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, 9220, Aalborg East, Denmark.
Louise Mailund MikkelsenCenter for Membrane Technology, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, 9220, Aalborg East, Denmark.
Nikitha ThavaneswaranCenter for Membrane Technology, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, 9220, Aalborg East, Denmark.
Simon Abildgaard HansenCenter for Membrane Technology, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, 9220, Aalborg East, Denmark.
Pernille Krogsager JensenCenter for Membrane Technology, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, 9220, Aalborg East, Denmark.
Jacob AndersenCenter for Membrane Technology, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, 9220, Aalborg East, Denmark.
David N Østedgaard-MunckLiqTech International A/S, Benshøj Industrivej 24, 9500, Hobro, Denmark.
Jan Dimon BendtsenDepartment of Electronic Systems, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7, 9220, Aalborg East, Denmark.
Morten Lykkegaard ChristensenCenter for Membrane Technology, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, 9220, Aalborg East, Denmark.

Funding

Villum Fonden 50089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Membrane fouling significantly reduces membrane permeability, leading to higher operational expenses. In situ monitoring of membrane fouling can potentially be used to reduce operation cost by optimizing operational parameters and cleaning conditions. In this study, a platinum wire with a diameter of 20 µm was attached to the surface of a ceramic ultrafiltration membrane, and by measuring the voltage across the wire while applying an AC current, the amplitude of the third harmonic wave, the so-called 3ω signal, was obtained. Results showed increasing 3ω signals during formation of fouling layers, which correlates directly to the hydraulic resistance of the formed fouling layer in semi-dead end filtration of polymeric core shell particles and crossflow filtration of diluted milk. This is explained by the insulating effect of the fouling layers which reduces heat convection by crossflow and the different thermal conductivity in the fouling layer compared with the feed. After membrane cleaning, the permeability and the magnitude of the 3ω signal were partly restored, showing that the 3ω method can be used to monitor the effect of cleaning. The frequency of the AC current was varied so it was possible to measure the heat conductivity in the fouling layer (high frequency) and heat convection due to cross-flow (low frequency). This may potentially be used to get information of the type of fouling (heat conductivity) and thickness of the fouling layer (AC frequency where heat conductivity becomes dominating).

Identifiers

PMID37709852
PMCPMC10502093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.