Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37709797›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Genetic risk assessment based on association and prediction studies.

Nicole Cathlene N Astrologo, Joverlyn D Gaudillo, Jason R Albia, Ranzivelle Marianne L Roxas-Villanueva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicole Cathlene N AstrologoData Analytics Research Laboratory (DARELab), Institute of Mathematical Sciences and Physics, University of the Philippines Los Baños, 4031, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines.
Joverlyn D GaudilloData Analytics Research Laboratory (DARELab), Institute of Mathematical Sciences and Physics, University of the Philippines Los Baños, 4031, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines. jdgaudillo@up.edu.ph.
Jason R AlbiaDomingo AI Research Center (DARC Labs), 1606, Pasig, Philippines.
Ranzivelle Marianne L Roxas-VillanuevaData Analytics Research Laboratory (DARELab), Institute of Mathematical Sciences and Physics, University of the Philippines Los Baños, 4031, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genetic basis of phenotypic emergence provides valuable information for assessing individual risk. While association studies have been pivotal in identifying genetic risk factors within a population, complementing it with insights derived from predictions studies that assess individual-level risk offers a more comprehensive approach to understanding phenotypic expression. In this study, we established personalized risk assessment models using single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data from 200 Korean patients, of which 100 experienced hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance and 100 patients demonstrated high levels of HBsAg. The risk assessment models determined the predictive power of the following: (1) genome-wide association study (GWAS)-identified candidate biomarkers considered significant in a reference study and (2) machine learning (ML)-identified candidate biomarkers with the highest feature importance scores obtained by using random forest (RF). While utilizing all features yielded 64% model accuracy, using relevant biomarkers achieved higher model accuracies: 82% for 52 GWAS-identified candidate biomarkers, 71% for three GWAS-identified biomarkers, and 80% for 150 ML-identified candidate biomarkers. Findings highlight that the joint contributions of relevant biomarkers significantly influence phenotypic emergence. On the other hand, combining ML-identified candidate biomarkers into the pool of GWAS-identified candidate biomarkers resulted in the improved predictive accuracy of 90%, demonstrating the capability of ML as an auxiliary analysis to GWAS. Furthermore, some of the ML-identified candidate biomarkers were found to be linked with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), reinforcing previous claims that HCC can still occur despite the absence of HBsAg.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsGenome-Wide Association StudyHepatitis B Surface AntigensHumansRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsHepatitis B Surface Antigens

Identifiers

PMID37709797
PMCPMC10502006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.