Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37709750›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Action initiation and punishment learning differ from childhood to adolescence while reward learning remains stable.

Ruth Pauli, Inti A Brazil, Gregor Kohls, Miriam C Klein-Flügge, Jack C Rogers, Dimitris Dikeos, Roberta Dochnal, Graeme Fairchild, Aranzazu Fernández-Rivas, Beate Herpertz-Dahlmann and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Altered learning from positive feedback in adolescents with anorexia nervosa.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Cortical Grey Matter Mediates Increases in Model-Based Control and Learning from Positive Feedback from Adolescence to Adulthood.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Ruth PauliCentre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. r.pauli@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7479-0637
Inti A BrazilRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Gregor KohlsChild Neuropsychology Section, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Miriam C Klein-FlüggeDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5156-9833
Jack C RogersCentre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Dimitris DikeosDepartment of Psychiatry, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Roberta DochnalFaculty of Medicine, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of the Child Health Center, Szeged University, Szeged, Hungary.
Graeme FairchildDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Aranzazu Fernández-RivasBasurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.
Beate Herpertz-DahlmannChild Neuropsychology Section, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Amaia HervasUniversity Hospital Mutua Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.
Kerstin KonradChild Neuropsychology Section, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Arne PopmaDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Christina StadlerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Christine M FreitagDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9676-4782
Stephane A De BritoCentre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Patricia L LockwoodCentre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. p.l.lockwood@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7195-9559

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P014097/1Medical Research Council MR/P014097/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theoretical and empirical accounts suggest that adolescence is associated with heightened reward learning and impulsivity. Experimental tasks and computational models that can dissociate reward learning from the tendency to initiate actions impulsively (action initiation bias) are thus critical to characterise the mechanisms that drive developmental differences. However, existing work has rarely quantified both learning ability and action initiation, or it has relied on small samples. Here, using computational modelling of a learning task collected from a large sample (N = 742, 9-18 years, 11 countries), we test differences in reward and punishment learning and action initiation from childhood to adolescence. Computational modelling reveals that whilst punishment learning rates increase with age, reward learning remains stable. In parallel, action initiation biases decrease with age. Results are similar when considering pubertal stage instead of chronological age. We conclude that heightened reward responsivity in adolescence can reflect differences in action initiation rather than enhanced reward learning.

Indexed as

CognitionPunishmentAdolescentChildComputer SimulationHumansLearningReward

Identifiers

PMID37709750
PMCPMC10502052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.