Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37709493›Full record

ArticleGut2024

Enhanced antitumour immunity following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy mediates a favourable prognosis in women with resected pancreatic cancer.

Casper W F van Eijck, Dana A M Mustafa, Disha Vadgama, Noel F C C de Miranda, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Geertjan van Tienhoven, Sjoerd H van der Burg, Núria Malats, Casper H J van Eijck, Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group (DPCG)

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Updates in Immunotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. [Sex differences in pancreatic cancer].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Casper W F van EijckDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands c.vaneijck@erasmusmc.nl nmalats@cnio.es c.w.f.vaneijck@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-1461-6725
Dana A M MustafaDepartment of Pathology, Tumour-Immuno Pathology Laboratory, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0644-078X
Disha VadgamaDepartment of Pathology, Tumour-Immuno Pathology Laboratory, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Noel F C C de MirandaDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6122-1024
Bas Groot KoerkampDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Geertjan van TienhovenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sjoerd H van der BurgDepartment of Medical Oncology, Oncode Institute, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Núria MalatsGenetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre, and CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain c.vaneijck@erasmusmc.nl nmalats@cnio.es c.w.f.vaneijck@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-2538-3784
Casper H J van EijckDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands c.vaneijck@erasmusmc.nl nmalats@cnio.es c.w.f.vaneijck@erasmusmc.nl.
Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group (DPCG)
Erasmus MC · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLSpanish National Cancer Research Centre · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study investigates sex disparities in clinical outcomes and tumour immune profiles in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who underwent upfront resection or resection preceded by gemcitabine-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

methodsPatients originated from the PREOPANC randomised controlled trial. Upfront surgery was performed in 82 patients, and 66 received nCRT before resection. The impact of sex on overall survival (OS) was investigated using Cox proportional hazards models. The immunological landscape within the tumour microenvironment (TME) was mapped using transcriptomic and spatial proteomic profiling.

resultsThe 5-year OS rate differed between the sexes following resection preceded by nCRT, with 43% for women compared with 22% for men. In multivariate analysis, the female sex was a favourable independent prognostic factor for OS only in the nCRT group (HR 0.19; 95% CI 0.07 to 0.52). Multivariate heterogeneous treatment effects analysis revealed a significant interaction between sex and treatment, implying increased nCRT efficacy among women with resected PDAC. The TME of women contained fewer protumoural CD163+MRC1+M2 macrophages than that of men after nCRT, as indicated by transcriptomic and validated using spatial proteomic profiling.

conclusionPDAC tumours of women are more sensitive to gemcitabine-based nCRT, resulting in longer OS after resection compared with men. This may be due to enhanced immunity impeding the infiltration of protumoral M2 macrophages into the TME. Our findings highlight the importance of considering sex disparities and mitigating immunosuppressive macrophage polarisation for personalised PDAC treatment.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsFemaleGemcitabineHumansMaleNeoadjuvant TherapyPrognosisProteomicsRetrospective StudiesTumor MicroenvironmentGemcitabineCHEMOTHERAPYMACROPHAGESPANCREATIC CANCERPANCREATIC SURGERYRADIOTHERAPY

Identifiers

PMID37709493
PMCPMC10850691
OpenAlexW4386738385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.