Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37709347›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2023

Provision of evaluation and management visits by nurse practitioners and physician assistants in the USA from 2013 to 2019: cross-sectional time series study.

Sadiq Y Patel, David Auerbach, Haiden A Huskamp, Austin Frakt, Hannah Neprash, Michael L Barnett, Hannah O James, Laura Barrie Smith, Ateev Mehrotra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Optimizing NP and PA roles to improve care access in an academic medical center: An organizational case study.JAAPA : official journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Clinician type and care setting for treatment of Medicare beneficiaries with dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sadiq Y PatelDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
David AuerbachMassachusetts Health Policy Commission, Boston, MA, USA.
Haiden A HuskampDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Austin FraktDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Hannah NeprashDivision of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Michael L BarnettDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Hannah O JamesDepartment of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Laura Barrie SmithHealth Policy Center, Urban Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Ateev MehrotraDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA mehrotra@hcp.med.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2223-1582

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the proportion of healthcare visits are delivered by nurse practitioners and physician assistants versus physicians and how this has changed over time and by clinical setting, diagnosis, and patient demographics.

designCross-sectional time series study.

settingNational data from the traditional Medicare insurance program in the USA.

participantsOf people using Medicare (ie, those older than 65 years, permanently disabled, and people with end stage renal disease), a 20% random sample was taken.

main outcome measuresThe proportion of physician, nurse practitioner, and physician assistant visits in the outpatient and skilled nursing facility settings delivered by physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants, and how this proportion varies by type of visit and diagnosis.

resultsFrom 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2019, 276 million visits were included in the sample. The proportion of all visits delivered by nurse practitioners and physician assistants in a year increased from 14.0% (95% confidence interval 14.0% to 14.0%) to 25.6% (25.6% to 25.6%). In 2019, the proportion of visits delivered by a nurse practitioner or physician assistant varied across conditions, ranging from 13.2% for eye disorders and 20.4% for hypertension to 36.7% for anxiety disorders and 41.5% for respiratory infections. Among all patients with at least one visit in 2019, 41.9% had one or more nurse practitioner or physician assistant visits. Compared with patients who had no visits from a nurse practitioner or physician assistant, the likelihood of receiving any care was greatest among patients who were lower income (2.9% greater), rural residents (19.7%), and disabled (5.6%).

conclusionThe proportion of visits delivered by nurse practitioners and physician assistants in the USA is increasing rapidly and now accounts for a quarter of all healthcare visits.

Indexed as

Nurse PractitionersPhysician AssistantsAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMedicareTime FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID37709347
PMCPMC10498453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.