Trial reportBMJ open2023
A qualitative exploration of the experiences of shift workers participated in a low-calorie meal replacement dietary intervention.
Trial report in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The experiences of night shift workers following three different dietary weight loss interventions: a qualitative study using behaviour change theory.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesShift work is associated with various health challenges, including obesity and metabolic disturbances. To address these concerns, a randomised controlled clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of a low-calorie meal replacement (MR) dietary intervention for dinner among shift workers with obesity. This study focuses on the qualitative aspects of this intervention, aiming to explore the experiences and perceptions of shift workers who participated in the trial.
designFollowing the completion of the intervention, semi-structured face-to-face or telephone interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of trial participants. Data analysis was inductive, thematic using NVivo V.10 software.
settingThe intervention was conducted among shift workers with obesity in a private hospital in Sri Lanka and resulted in a modest decrease in weight.
participantsUsing purposeful maximum variation sampling, we recruited eight healthcare shift workers who took part in a weight loss intervention.
resultsAll participants expressed satisfaction with the MR meal for dinner, highlighting its positive impact on their well-being. Despite initial difficulties, strong determination and motivation by results supported adherence. Some participants suggested that the MR could be improved with sweeter taste and more flavour options. Few reported mild bloating at the beginning, but no serious side effects were noted. Participants felt lighter in their bodies due to weight loss. The method's simplicity was the most frequently reported benefit, making it feasible even during busy night shifts. Overall, participants highly recommended the intervention to others in need.
conclusionParticipants experienced weight loss by replacing their dinner with the MR. This study offers valuable insights for tailoring future workplace-based dietary interventions for this vulnerable population. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12622000231741.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.