Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37709320›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Effects of intravenous sivelestat sodium on prevention of acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with sepsis: study protocol for a double-blind multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Shaolei Ma, Cong Li, Zhiwei Gao, Jianfeng Xie, Haibo Qiu, Yi Yang, Ling Liu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04973670 (Protective Effect of Sivelestat Sodium on ARDS in Patients With Sepsis), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04973670 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Protective Effect of Sivelestat Sodium on ARDS in Patients With Sepsis: Multicenter, Random, Double-blind, Parallel, Placebo Control Clinical Trials

TypeinterventionalSponsorSoutheast University, ChinaRan2021 to 2023Enrolled238ConditionsARDSArmsSivelestat sodium, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shaolei MaJiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3817-1767
Cong LiJiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Zhiwei GaoJiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Jianfeng XieJiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6097-9172
Haibo QiuJiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Yi YangJiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China liulingdoctor@126.com yiyiyang2004@163.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1661-3568
Ling LiuJiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China liulingdoctor@126.com yiyiyang2004@163.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6431-6352

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSepsis is one of the most common risk factors for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Neutrophil elastase (NE) is believed to be an important mediator of ARDS. When sepsis occurs, a large number of inflammatory factors are activated and released, which makes neutrophils migrate into the lung, eventually leading to the occurrence of ARDS. Sivelestat sodium is an NE inhibitor that can inhibit the inflammatory reaction during systemic inflammatory response syndrome and alleviate lung injury. Therefore, we hypothesise that intravenous sivelestat sodium may prevent the occurrence of ARDS in patients with sepsis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, investigator-initiated, double-blind, adaptive, multicentre, randomised, controlled clinical trial with an adaptive 'sample size re-estimation' design. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria who were transferred into the intensive care unit will be randomly assigned to receive sivelestat sodium or placebo for up to 7 days. The primary outcome is the development of ARDS within 7 days after randomisation. A total of 238 patients will be recruited based on a 15% decrease in the incidence of ARDS in the intervention group in this study. A predefined interim analysis will be performed to ensure that the calculation is reasonable after reaching 50% (120) of the planned sample size. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of ZhongDa Hospital affiliated to Southeast University (identifier: Clinical Ethical Approval No. 2021ZDSYLL153-P03). Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences and meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04973670.

Indexed as

Respiratory Distress SyndromeSepsisDouble-Blind MethodGlycineHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSodiumSulfonamidesGlycinesivelestatSodiumSulfonamidesAdult intensive & critical careAUDITClinical Trial

Identifiers

PMID37709320
PMCPMC10503371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.