Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37708656›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology2023

Outcomes following elective cerclage versus ultrasound surveillance in women with one prior preterm event.

Joshua Mullin, Hannah Rosen O'Sullivan, Andrew H Shennan, Natalie Suff

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joshua MullinDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Hannah Rosen O'SullivanDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Andrew H ShennanDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Natalie SuffDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK. Electronic address: natalie.suff@kcl.ac.uk.
King's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePreterm birth, defined as delivery before 37 weeks' gestation, is a major obstetric challenge and is associated with serious long-term complications in those infants that survive. Preventative management includes cervical cerclage, either as an elective procedure or performed following transvaginal ultrasound surveillance and shortening of the cervix (≤25 mm). Significant questions remain regarding the optimal management, target population and technique. Therefore, this study aimed to assess differences in risk factors and pregnancy outcomes for women who received an elective cerclage versus ultrasound surveillance, following one prior premature event (spontaneous preterm birth/second trimester loss). STUDY

designWomen were retrospectively identified from St Thomas's Hospital Preterm Birth Clinical Network Database. Women who had one prior premature event (between 14

resultsWe collected data from 1077 women who had a prior preterm event. 66 women received an elective cerclage. 11.4% of women who had ultrasound surveillance received an ultrasound indicated cerclage. Women with a prior history of mid-trimester loss, instead of preterm birth, were more likely to receive an elective cerclage. The mean gestational age of delivery was similar between those women who received an elective cerclage and those who had ultrasound surveillance with and without an ultrasound-indicated cerclage (38

conclusionsIn conclusion, this study shows that in women with one prior preterm event, both history-indicated cerclage and ultrasound surveillance are appropriate management options. The majority of women undergoing ultrasound surveillance did not require a cerclage and so avoided the potential perioperative complications of cerclage insertion. However, those that did require an ultrasound-indicated cerclage were at high risk of preterm birth so should be followed up closely to enable adequate preterm birth preparation. Further prospective studies comparing history indicated cerclage and US surveillance in women with one prior preterm event are necessary.

Indexed as

Cerclage, CervicalPremature BirthCervical Length MeasurementCervix UteriFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesCervical cerclageElective cerclageMid-trimester lossPreterm birthUltrasound-indicated cerclage

Identifiers

PMID37708656
PMCPMC10878982
OpenAlexW4386397675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.