ArticlePloS one2023
Macular retinal circulation in healthy eyes examined by optical coherence tomography angiography extended interscan time analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo examine whether extended interscan time (IST) on optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) can detect slow retinal blood flow, which is undetectable on default IST, in the healthy macula.
methodsOCTA (OCT-A1, Canon Inc.) scanning of a macular area measuring 4 × 4 mm2 of 14 healthy eyes of 14 healthy volunteers with no history or evidence of systemic and macular diseases was performed. ISTs were set at 7.6 (IST7.6, default setting), 12.0 (IST12.0), and 20.6 msec (IST20.6). Ten OCTA images were acquired at each IST, and an averaged image was created. For each averaged OCTA image obtained at IST7.6, IST12.0, and IST20.6, we defined the area surrounded by the innermost capillary ring as the foveal avascular zone (FAZ). We qualitatively evaluated the delineation of the capillaries consisting of the FAZ and quantitatively measured the FAZ area at each IST.
resultsExtensions from IST7.6 to IST12.0 and IST20.6 could newly delineated retinal capillaries that were undetectable at the default IST; new capillaries were detected in 10 (71%) eyes at IST12.0 and 11 (78%) eyes at IST20.0. The FAZ areas were 0.334 ± 0.137 mm2, 0.320 ± 0.132 mm2, and 0.319 ± 0.129 mm2 for IST7.6, IST12.0, and IST20.0, respectively; the FAZ areas at IST12.0 and IST20.0 were significantly decreased compared with that at IST7.6 (p = 0.004 and 0.002, respectively).
conclusionIn OCTA for healthy participants, extensions of the ISTs newly detected retinal capillaries with slow blood flow around FAZ. The FAZ shapes varied with different ISTs. Thus, the blood flow dynamics are not physiologically uniform around FAZ. Compared with conventional OCTA, this protocol enables a more detailed evaluation of retinal circulation and provides a better understanding of the physiological circulatory status of the healthy retina, and may enable the assessment of circulation in the very early stages in diseased eyes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.