Observational studyPloS one2023
Monitoring the appropriate prescription of low molecular weight heparins and Fondaparinux through administrative data. A retrospective observational study in the Tuscany region.
Observational study in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLow Molecular Weight Heparins (LMWHs) and Fondaparinux have been widely used as anticoagulants. Mass prescription may lead to prescriptive inappropriateness, which causes Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and other side effects.
objectivesThe study investigates the appropriate prescription of LMWHs and Fondaparinux in Tuscany. We aim to validate the crude measure of prescription appropriateness of the Key Performance Indicator (KPI) "Patients treated with LMWHs and Fondaparinux every hundred residents in Tuscany" as a proxy for monitoring prescription appropriateness.
methodsTo compare a crude KPI based only on drug consumption with a refined KPI based on exclusions listed in the clinical guidelines, a retrospective observational cohort study was carried out, using the RECORD guidelines for the year 2019. The refined indicator is computed via record linkage of different datasets regarding (a) pharmaceutical services; (b) hospital discharge records; (c) outpatient services; and (d) birth certificates. We apply exclusion criteria to identify the cohort of patients. Values of the KPI are compared, by ranking, with those obtained from its refined version. A Spearman test was performed to validate the use of the crude KPI as a proxy.
results208,717 LMWH and Fondaparinux users are identified, of which 103,299 fall within the study's inclusion criteria. 16,817 (16%) of LMWHs and Fondaparinux users are classified as high consumption. The refined version of the KPI produces the same ranking results in terms of local health districts (rho = 0.98 p<0.01).
conclusionsAlthough the crude KPI is less refined and detailed than the adjusted indicator computed by our study, it has proven capable to provide an accurate snapshot of the use of these drugs across the region. This analysis is useful to enable regional and local managers to run rapid and simple indicators to monitor the appropriateness of LMWHs and Fondaparinux. This analysis should be reviewed periodically to confirm its accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.