ArticlePloS one2023
Study on segmentation of blasting fragment images from open-pit mine based on U-CARFnet.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research on a detection method for blast rock fragments based on concavity-based pre-segmentation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bench blasting is the primary means of production in open-pit metal mines. The size of the resulting rock mass after blasting has a significant impact on production cost. Currently, the ore fragment size is obtained mainly through manual measurement or estimation with the naked eye, which is inefficient and inaccurate. This study proposes the U-CARFnet and U-Net models for segmenting blasting fragment images from open-pit mines based on an attention mechanism, residual learning module, and focal loss function. It compares this technique with traditional image segmentation ones and a variety of deep learning models to verify the efficacy of the proposed model. Experimental results show that the accuracy of the U-CARFnet model proposed in this paper reaches 97.11% in the performance evaluation, which shows better performance than the traditional image segmentation method. In this study, the U-CARFnet model is used in the application, and a superior performance is obtained, with an average segmentation error of 5.46%. The proposed approach provides an effective technique for statistically analyzing images of mine rock.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.