Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37708149›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

The role of civil society organizations (CSOs) in the COVID-19 response across the Global South: A multinational, qualitative study.

Adam C Levine, Anna Park, Anindita Adhikari, Maria Carinnes P Alejandria, Benjamin H Bradlow, Maria F Lopez-Portillo, Salma Mutwafy, Ieva Zumbyte, Patrick Heller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Adam C LevineWatson Institute for International and Public Affairs, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3982-3824
Anna ParkWatson Institute for International and Public Affairs, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.
Anindita AdhikariDepartment of Sociology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.
Maria Carinnes P AlejandriaDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei.
Benjamin H BradlowSchool of Public and International Affairs and Department of Sociology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America.
Maria F Lopez-PortilloDepartment of Sociology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.
Salma MutwafyDepartment of Sociology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4700-9603
Ieva ZumbyteDepartment of Sociology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5314-7642
Patrick HellerWatson Institute for International and Public Affairs, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite receiving less attention than high-income countries, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) experienced more than 85% of global excess deaths during the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to the unprecedented speed and scale of the COVID-19 pandemic, which placed large demands on government capacity, many LMICs relied on civil society organizations (CSOs) to assist in implementing COVID-19 response programs. Yet few studies have examined the critical role CSOs played in mitigating the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in low resource settings. This study explored the CSO response to COVID-19 in five of the most heavily impacted LMICs in the Global South. Interviews were conducted from May to August 2021 with a purposive sample of CSO key informants within each of the five countries. A total of 52 CSOs were selected from which 53 key informants were interviewed either via Zoom or by phone. Interviews were coded and analyzed using NVivo or MAXQDA2020. Out of the 52 CSOs selected, 24 were national organizations, 8 were regional, and 20 were local. CSOs fell into six categories: community-based organizations, non-governmental organizations, unions/professional organizations, campaigns/social movements, research organizations/think tanks, and networks/coalitions. CSOs across all five countries adapted their missions, stretched their resources, and performed a wide range of activities that fit into five programmatic areas: food security and livelihood support, public health and medical care, cash transfer programs, risk communication and community education, and needs assessment. This qualitative analysis demonstrates the critical role CSOs played in supplementing government emergency aid response by delivering necessary resources and supporting highly vulnerable populations during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the primary challenges they faced in doing so. Given the generally weak state of public capacity in the LMICs studied, this role was vital to responding to the pandemic.

Identifiers

PMID37708149
PMCPMC10501645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.